These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14570166)

  • 1. A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs.
    Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Jul; 40(4):586-96. PubMed ID: 14570166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
    Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate tests of means in independent groups designs. Effects of covariance heterogeneity and nonnormality.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ
    Eval Health Prof; 2004 Mar; 27(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 14994559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: an update for psychophysiological researchers.
    Keselman HJ
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 9643062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust tests for multivariate factorial designs under heteroscedasticity.
    Vallejo G; Ato M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):471-89. PubMed ID: 21994181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Trimmed Means to Compare K Measures Corresponding to Two Independent Groups.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2001 Jul; 36(3):421-44. PubMed ID: 26751183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for negligible interaction: A coherent and robust approach.
    Cribbie RA; Ragoonanan C; Counsell A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 27022015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
    Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The new and improved two-sample T test.
    Keselman HJ; Othman AR; Wilcox RR; Fradette K
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Jan; 15(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 14717831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STATSLAB: An open-source EEG toolbox for computing single-subject effects using robust statistics.
    Campopiano A; van Noordt SJR; Segalowitz SJ
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 347():425-435. PubMed ID: 29574102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing Multivariate Repeated Measures Designs: A Comparison of Two Approximate Degrees of Freedom Procedures.
    Lix LM; Algina J; Keselman HJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):403-31. PubMed ID: 26777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating group distributional characteristics: why psychophysiologists should be interested in qualitative departures from the normal distribution.
    Riniolo TC; Porges SW
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 10705764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploratory EEG data analysis for psychophysiological experiments.
    Marroquin JL; Harmony T; Rodriguez V; Valdes P
    Neuroimage; 2004 Mar; 21(3):991-9. PubMed ID: 15006666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ; Hinds AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power.
    Blanca MJ; Arnau J; García-Castro FJ; Alarcón R; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2023 Feb; 35(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36695847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Least Squares and Robust Rank-Based Double Bootstrap Analyses for Time-Series Intervention Designs.
    Zhang S; McKean JW; Huitema BE
    Eval Health Prof; 2022 Dec; 45(4):362-376. PubMed ID: 35994023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of Parameter Estimation to Assumptions of Normality in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Wang C; Su S; Weiss DJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):403-418. PubMed ID: 29624093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Round-off error, blind faith, and the powers that be: a caution on numerical error in coefficients for polynomial curves fit to psychophysical data.
    Samar VJ; De Filippo CL
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 9661737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.