These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14571171)

  • 1. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop.
    Nebot PB; Jain Y; Haylett K; Stone R; McCloy R
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Oct; 13(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 14571171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eye gaze tracking for endoscopic camera positioning: an application of a hardware/software interface developed to automate Aesop.
    Ali SM; Reisner LA; King B; Cao A; Auner G; Klein M; Pandya AK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():4-7. PubMed ID: 18391246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Aiono S; Gilbert JM; Soin B; Finlay PA; Gordan A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1267-70. PubMed ID: 12235507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical robotics. Evaluation of the Computer Motion AESOP 3000 robotic endoscope holder.
    Health Devices; 2002 Jul; 31(7):256-68. PubMed ID: 12187573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Gilbert JM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Jul; 91(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 19409150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative experimental study evaluating the performance of surgical robots aesop and endosista.
    Yavuz Y; Ystgaard B; Skogvoll E; Mårvik R
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2000 Jun; 10(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10872979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder.
    Merola S; Weber P; Wasielewski A; Ballantyne GH
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2002 Feb; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 12008762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of human and robotic camera control in laparoscopic biliary and colon surgery.
    Proske JM; Dagher I; Franco D
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2004 Dec; 14(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 15684779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
    Rassweiler J; Frede T
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Use of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery: state of the art].
    Long JA; Descotes JL; Skowron O; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Boillot B; Terrier N; Rambeaud JJ
    Prog Urol; 2006 Feb; 16(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16526532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery.
    Kommu SS; Rimington P; Anderson C; Rané A
    J Robot Surg; 2007; 1(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 25484949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.
    Mettler L; Ibrahim M; Jonat W
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2748-50. PubMed ID: 9804224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences of using the EndoAssist-robot in surgery.
    Halín N; Loula P; Aarnio P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 125():161-3. PubMed ID: 17377257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three different techniques for camera and motion control of a teleoperated robot.
    Doisy G; Ronen A; Edan Y
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():527-534. PubMed ID: 27181096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery.
    Palep JH
    J Minim Access Surg; 2009 Jan; 5(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19547687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of control modes of a hand-held robot for laparoscopic surgery.
    Tonet O; Focacci F; Piccigallo M; Cavallo F; Uematsu M; Megali G; Dario P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):429-36. PubMed ID: 17354919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery].
    Córdova Dupeyrat A; Ballantyne GH
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2003; 23(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12768216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
    Ballantyne GH
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of manual steering and steering via joystick of a flexible rhino endoscope.
    Eckl R; Gumprecht JJ; Strauss G; Hofer M; Dietz A; Lueth TC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1234-7. PubMed ID: 21096123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.