These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

37 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14573447)

  • 1. Impact of ambient light and window settings on the detectability of catheters on soft-copy display of chest radiographs at bedside.
    Fuchsjäger MH; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Eisenhuber E; Homolka P; Weber M; Funovics MA; Prokop M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1415-21. PubMed ID: 14573447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Scharitzer M; Prokop M; Weber M; Fuchsjäger M; Oschatz E; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 15601893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of monitoring materials on bedside chest radiographs with the most recent generation of storage phosphor plates: dose increase does not improve detection performance.
    Eisenhuber E; Stadler A; Prokop M; Fuchsjager M; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):216-21. PubMed ID: 12668747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
    Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study.
    Balassy C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 15728593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grids and high kilo-volt-peak-setting in bedside chest radiographic examinations.
    Grunert JH; Boy B; Busche D; Groenewold SK; Herrmann H; Krahn-Peters V; Maier J; Meier S; Penndorf-Wehner F; Störl C; Hendrickx P
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Dec; 83(6):296-9. PubMed ID: 11210681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
    Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced visualization processing: effect on workflow.
    Krupinski EA; Radvany M; Levy A; Ballenger D; Tucker J; Chacko A; VanMetter R
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Nov; 8(11):1127-33. PubMed ID: 11721812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Liver and bone window settings for soft-copy interpretation of chest and abdominal CT.
    Pomerantz SM; White CS; Krebs TL; Daly B; Sukumar SA; Hooper F; Siegel EL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Feb; 174(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 10658696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using edge enhancement to identify subtle findings on soft-copy neonatal chest radiographs.
    Goo HW; Kim HJ; Song KS; Kim EA; Kim KS; Yoon CH; Pi SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 11461878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of different review displays with respect to the detection of low-contrast details in digital radiographs].
    Wirth S; Schöfer H; Kotsianos-Hermle D; Körner M; Lucke A; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Treitl M
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):698-705. PubMed ID: 16817123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: a hard- versus soft-copy comparative study].
    Bricault I; Bosson JL; Declety P; Lavagne P; Ferretti G
    J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):993-9. PubMed ID: 13679753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.