BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14573472)

  • 1. Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Peters AD; Halligan DL; Whitlock MC; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2003 Oct; 165(2):589-99. PubMed ID: 14573472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A test for epistasis among induced mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Peters AD; Keightley PD
    Genetics; 2000 Dec; 156(4):1635-47. PubMed ID: 11102363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating numbers of EMS-induced mutations affecting life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans in crosses between inbred sublines.
    Halligan DL; Peters AD; Keightley PD
    Genet Res; 2003 Dec; 82(3):191-205. PubMed ID: 15134198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Davies EK; Peters AD; Keightley PD
    Science; 1999 Sep; 285(5434):1748-51. PubMed ID: 10481013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus.
    Willis JH
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1885-98. PubMed ID: 10581293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Szafraniec K; Wloch DM; Sliwa P; Borts RH; Korona R
    Genet Res; 2003 Aug; 82(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 14621268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How common are overdominant mutations?
    Fry JD
    Genetics; 2004 Jun; 167(2):1031-2. PubMed ID: 15238551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of ethylmethane sulfonate-induced mutations affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans and inferences about bivariate distributions of mutation effects.
    Keightley PD; Davies EK; Peters AD; Shaw RG
    Genetics; 2000 Sep; 156(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 10978281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Next-Generation Sequencing for Identification of EMS-Induced Mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Lehrbach NJ; Ji F; Sadreyev R
    Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2017 Jan; 117():7.29.1-7.29.12. PubMed ID: 28060408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Vassilieva LL; Hook AM; Lynch M
    Evolution; 2000 Aug; 54(4):1234-46. PubMed ID: 11005291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethyl methanesulfonate induces mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos at a high frequency.
    Hartman PS; Barry J; Finstad W; Khan N; Tanaka M; Yasuda K; Ishii N
    Mutat Res; 2014; 766-767():44-8. PubMed ID: 25847271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate, UV, and trimethylpsoralen in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Gengyo-Ando K; Mitani S
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2000 Mar; 269(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 10694478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Heterozygous effect of polygenic mutations.
    Ohnishi O
    Genetics; 1977 Nov; 87(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 200527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Purging deleterious mutations under self fertilization: paradoxical recovery in fitness with increasing mutation rate in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Morran LT; Ohdera AH; Phillips PC
    PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e14473. PubMed ID: 21217820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations.
    García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2000 Aug; 155(4):1991-2001. PubMed ID: 10924491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitness effects of EMS-induced mutations on the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability effects and heterozygous fitness effects.
    Mitchell JA
    Genetics; 1977 Dec; 87(4):763-74. PubMed ID: 414960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of a life-extending mutation in age-2, a new aging gene in Caenorhabditis elegans.
    Yang Y; Wilson DL
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 1999 Apr; 54(4):B137-42. PubMed ID: 10219000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Isolating mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents.
    Hartman PS; Ishii N
    Methods Mol Biol; 1999; 113():11-6. PubMed ID: 10443407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for the partial dominance of viability genes contributing to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus.
    Fu YB; Ritland K
    Genetics; 1994 Jan; 136(1):323-31. PubMed ID: 8138168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments.
    Manoel D; Carvalho S; Phillips PC; Teotónio H
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Feb; 274(1608):417-24. PubMed ID: 17164206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.