These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1457483)
1. [Lobular carcinoma of the breast in magnetic resonance tomography. A case report]. Wilhelm K; Grebe P; Teifke A; Halbsguth A; Mitze M; Thelen M Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):373-5. PubMed ID: 1457483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Boetes C; Mus RD; Holland R; Barentsz JO; Strijk SP; Wobbes T; Hendriks JH; Ruys SH Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 7480749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Gadolinium-DTPA (Magnevist) as contrast medium for galactography]. Kaltenborn H; Schadmand S; Beck T; Thelen M Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):457-9. PubMed ID: 8527765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The feasibility of magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast tumors]. Zapf S; Halbsguth A; Brunier A; Mitze M; Klemencic J; Wilhelm K Rofo; 1991 Jan; 154(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 1846678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [MR mammography in patients at risk]. Kaiser WA; Mittelmeier O Rofo; 1992 Jun; 156(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 1617179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging enhancement features and cell proliferative activity determined by DNA S-phase percentage. Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Budnick RM; Stewart CC Cancer; 1996 May; 77(9):1844-9. PubMed ID: 8646683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Heywang SH; Wolf A; Pruss E; Hilbertz T; Eiermann W; Permanetter W Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 2648479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T]. Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid. Kaiser WA Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Weinstein SP; Orel SG; Heller R; Reynolds C; Czerniecki B; Solin LJ; Schnall M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Feb; 176(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 11159081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Fischer U; Kopka L; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(7):1002-5. PubMed ID: 9265662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Solitary breast metastasis as the first sign of a squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: imaging findings. Kelkar PS; Helbich TH; Becherer A; Rudas M; Lehner R; Mostbeck GH Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 9097059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]