These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1457540)

  • 1. Demonstration of digital radiographs by means of ink jet-printed paper copies: pilot study.
    Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Nilsson J; Lyttkens K; Andersson B; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Nov; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 1457540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The gray-scale ink-jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images.
    Combs MJ; Snell J; Cail WS; Maier T; Buck DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):225-7. PubMed ID: 7998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic yield of ink-jet prints from digital radiographs for the assessment of approximal carious lesions: ROC-analysis.
    Schulze RK; Grimm S; Schulze D; Voss K; Keller HP; Wedel M
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 20185261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method for producing x-ray test objects and phantoms.
    Theodorakou C; Horrocks JA; Marshall NW; Speller RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):1423-38. PubMed ID: 15152683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration of a radioactive ink-based stack phantom and its applications in nuclear medicine.
    El-Ali H; Ljungberg M; Strand SE; Palmer J; Malmgren L; Nilsson J
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2003 Apr; 18(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 12804045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2004 Mar; 8(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14652733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of ink jets in ultrasound registrations.
    Johansson T; Nilsson J; Almquist LO; Holmer NG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 1962356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproduction of radiologic images on plain paper.
    Ibbott GS; Zhang Y; Mohiuddin M; Adams E
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):755-60. PubMed ID: 9599396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of individually calibrated customary printers for assessment of typical dental diagnoses on glossy paper prints: a multicenter pilot study.
    Schulze RK; Schulze D; Voss K; Rottner M; Keller HP; Dollmann K; Maager B; Wedel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 18299235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ink-jet printout of radiographs on transparent film and glossy paper versus monitor display: an ROC analysis.
    Kühl S; Krummenauer F; Dagassan-Berndt D; Lambrecht TJ; d'Hoedt B; Schulze RK
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 20306098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of paper print and soft copy reading in plain paediatric radiographs.
    Maydell AT; Andronikou S; Ackermann C; Bezuidenhout AF
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19788481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Printed radiographs--is what you see what you get?
    Gerrard G
    Dent Update; 2013 Oct; 40(8):637-8, 641. PubMed ID: 24279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The film-based printout using Tetenal Printing Solution II.
    Geissler O; Rother U
    Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 18271500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biosurface engineering through ink jet printing.
    Khan MS; Fon D; Li X; Tian J; Forsythe J; Garnier G; Shen W
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Feb; 75(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 19879112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of dry laser printer versus paper printer in full-field digital mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Guo X; Rong D; Kang R; Mao G; Liu J; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 20092369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Display monitors for digital medical imaging.
    Andriole KP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):543-6. PubMed ID: 17411873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of dry silver hard copies in digital radiography.
    Trefler M; Yrizarry JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Oct; 149(4):853-6. PubMed ID: 3498340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic utility of thermal printed panographs compared with corresponding computer monitor images.
    Guerrant GH; Moore WS; Murchison DF
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):190-6; quiz 197-8. PubMed ID: 12004700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.