88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1457793)
1. [Clinical potentialities and limitations of two- and three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis].
Nöldeke HA; Friedrich JM; Wallner B; Weidenmaier W
Rofo; 1992 Dec; 157(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 1457793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid arteries: evaluation with low-field-strength MR angiography.
Pavone P; Marsili L; Catalano C; Petroni GA; Aytan E; Cardone GP; Passariello R
Radiology; 1992 Aug; 184(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 1620836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
Loubeyre P; Revel D; Garcia P; Delignette A; Canet E; Chirossel P; Genin G; Amiel M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.
Willig DS; Turski PA; Frayne R; Graves VB; Korosec FR; Swan JS; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):447-51. PubMed ID: 9680574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Carotid angiography by magnetic resonance].
Friedrich JM; Nöldecke HA; Tomczak R; Merkle E; Orend KH
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1993 Oct; 42(8):69-75. PubMed ID: 8122855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Remonda L; Senn P; Barth A; Arnold M; Lövblad KO; Schroth G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of MR phase-contrast flow quantification as an adjunct to MR angiography.
Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PL; Vainio PA; Soimakallio S
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 7824727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.
Huston J; Lewis BD; Wiebers DO; Meyer FB; Riederer SJ; Weaver AL
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 8421731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis.
DeMarco JK; Huston J; Bernstein MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):787-93. PubMed ID: 15333371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
Scarabino T; Carriero A; Balzano S; Sciannelli V; Bonomo L; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms.
Anderson CM; Lee RE; Levin DL; de la Torre Alonso S; Saloner D
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 8090894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography.
Polak JF; Bajakian RL; O'Leary DH; Anderson MR; Donaldson MC; Jolesz FA
Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 1727306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
