These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14578089)

  • 1. The interplay of stop signal inhibition and inhibition of return.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1349-71. PubMed ID: 14578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.
    Boehler CN; Münte TF; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 18440947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
    Stahl J; Gibbons H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.
    Kornylo K; Dill N; Saenz M; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):2984-99. PubMed ID: 12783947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
    Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of age on inhibition of return is independent of non-ocular response inhibition.
    Poliakoff E; Coward RS; Lowe C; O'Boyle DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16884743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return.
    Dukewich KR; Boehnke SE
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 18973792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return and repetition priming effects in localization and discrimination tasks.
    Taylor TL; Ivanoff J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):75-89. PubMed ID: 16035342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental trends in simple and selective inhibition of compatible and incompatible responses.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Mar; 87(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 14972598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.
    Corneil BD; Elsley JK
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):883-95. PubMed ID: 15728762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of return for expected and unexpected targets.
    Taylor TL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):257-73. PubMed ID: 16777045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microsaccadic response during inhibition of return in a target-target paradigm.
    Betta E; Galfano G; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 17087989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ko YT; Alsford T; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):465-77. PubMed ID: 22288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibitory motor control in apneic and insomniac patients: a stop task study.
    Sagaspe P; Philip P; Schwartz S
    J Sleep Res; 2007 Dec; 16(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 18036083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.
    Stevenson SA; Elsley JK; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):580-90. PubMed ID: 19019975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.