11567 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14578382)
1. Dose fractionation effects in primary and metastatic human uveal melanoma cell lines.
van den Aardweg GJ; Kiliç E; de Klein A; Luyten GP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):4660-4. PubMed ID: 14578382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cellular radiosensitivity of primary and metastatic human uveal melanoma cell lines.
van den Aardweg GJ; Naus NC; Verhoeven AC; de Klein A; Luyten GP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2561-5. PubMed ID: 12147585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sublethal damage repair in two radioresistant human tumor cell lines irradiated as multicellular spheroids.
Schwachöfer JH; Crooijmans RP; Hoogenhout J; Kal HB; Theeuwes AG
Tumour Biol; 1991; 12(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 1871510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiosensitivity, repair capacity, and stem cell fraction in human soft tissue tumors: an in vitro study using multicellular spheroids and the colony assay.
Stuschke M; Budach V; Klaes W; Sack H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 23(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 1572832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The radiosensitivity of uveal melanoma cells and the cell survival curve.
Soulières D; Rousseau A; Tardif M; Larochelle M; Tremblay M; Vaillancourt L; Pelletier G
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Feb; 233(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 7729709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional analysis of the p53 pathway in response to ionizing radiation in uveal melanoma.
Sun Y; Tran BN; Worley LA; Delston RB; Harbour JW
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1561-4. PubMed ID: 15851551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiosensitivity of new and established human melanoma cell lines: comparison of [3H]thymidine incorporation and soft agar clonogenic assays.
Marshall ES; Matthews JH; Shaw JH; Nixon J; Tumewu P; Finlay GJ; Holdaway KM; Baguley BC
Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(9):1370-6. PubMed ID: 7999427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Might intrinsic radioresistance of human tumour cells be induced by radiation?
Lambin P; Malaise EP; Joiner MC
Int J Radiat Biol; 1996 Mar; 69(3):279-90. PubMed ID: 8613677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential Radiosensitivity of Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines After X-rays or Carbon Ions Radiation.
Calipel A; Lux AL; Guérin S; Lefaix JL; Laurent C; Bernaudin M; Mouriaux F
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 May; 56(5):3085-94. PubMed ID: 26024093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Radiation pathomorphosis of malignant melanoma of the uveal tract of the human eye].
Vit VV
Oftalmol Zh; 1989; (6):321-5. PubMed ID: 2622594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The spectrum of in vitro radiosensitivity in four human melanoma cell lines is not accounted for by differential induction or rejoining of DNA double strand breaks.
McKay MJ; Kefford RF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jan; 31(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 7836088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No benefits of ultrafractionation in two head-and-neck cancer cell lines with different inherent radiosensitivity.
Boehringer-Wyss N; Clarkson SG; Allal AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1099-103. PubMed ID: 11958907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrinsic radiosensitivity and repair of sublethal radiation-induced damage in canine osteosarcoma cell lines.
Fitzpatrick CL; Farese JP; Milner RJ; Salute ME; Rajon DA; Morris CG; Bova FJ; Lurie DM; Siemann DW
Am J Vet Res; 2008 Sep; 69(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 18764694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A histologic study (including DNA quantification and Ki-67 labeling index) in uveal melanomas after brachytherapy with ruthenium plaques.
Schilling H; Sehu KW; Lee WR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Sep; 38(10):2081-92. PubMed ID: 9331272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inherent radiosensitivity and split-dose recovery in plateau-phase cultures of 10 human tumour cell lines.
Courdi A; Bensadoun RJ; Gioanni J; Caldani C
Radiother Oncol; 1992 Jun; 24(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 1496140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The intrinsic radiosensitivity and sublethal damage repair capacity of five cervical carcinoma cell lines tested with the 96-well-plate assay.
Rantanen V; Grénman S; Kulmala J; Grénman R
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1995; 121(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 7751322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between in vitro radiosensitivity and in vivo radioresponse in murine tumor cell lines. II: In vivo radioresponse following fractionated treatment and in vitro/in vivo correlations.
Bristow RG; Hill RP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Feb; 18(2):331-45. PubMed ID: 2303364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo alpha/beta ratios for prostate cancer.
Carlson DJ; Stewart RD; Li XA; Jennings K; Wang JZ; Guerrero M
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(19):4477-91. PubMed ID: 15552412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in repair of radiation induced damage in two human tumor cell lines as measured by cell survival and alkaline DNA unwinding.
Schwachöfer JH; Crooijmans RP; Hoogenhout H; Kal HB; Schaapveld RQ; Wessels J
Strahlenther Onkol; 1991 Jan; 167(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 1992541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potentiation of cell killing by low-dose-rate radiation by camptothecin is related to an increase in the level of DNA double-strand breaks.
Owen DG; McNamee JP; Raaphorst GP; Ng CE
Radiat Res; 2002 Feb; 157(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 11835678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
