These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 145789)

  • 41. [ECG seminar II. The myocardial infarct ECG].
    ZFA (Stuttgart); 1979 Aug; 55(24):1310-2. PubMed ID: 161445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
    Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Val PG; Chabot M
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computer analysis of the Frank electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram in patients with segmental areas of akinesia or dyskinesia on left ventricular angiogram.
    McCaughan D; Turini G; Pipberger HV
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():246-50. PubMed ID: 132099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multigroup classification by means of multivariate analysis. Comparison of an "optimal" 9-lead system and the frank leads.
    Kornreich F; Block P; Lebedelle M; Tiberghien J; Kornreich J
    Adv Cardiol; 1977; 19():201-4. PubMed ID: 138344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Vectorcardiographic criteria. Conclusions of the Hispano-portuguese Committee of Experts in Vectorcardiography].
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1982; 35(3):209-32. PubMed ID: 6215699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
    Willems JL; Lesaffre E
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Value of the Slapak and Partilla ECG leads in the differential diagnosis of Q 3].
    Walter J; Söhnlein B; Hirche U; Kircher S
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1972 Dec; 61(12):1111-20. PubMed ID: 4266233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Comparative studies of vectorcardiographic conductance methods].
    Karobath H; Wenger R
    Z Kreislaufforsch; 1967 Apr; 56(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 4232711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Characterization of the vectorcardiographic tracings in simple ventricular hypertrophy, using an electronic computer].
    Giusti C; Dalle Luche A; Salvatori E; Vischi E; Cini G; Galetta F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1983; 31(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 6221202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comuter pattern recognition of EKG. Evaluation of the recognition method].
    Yokoi M
    Jpn Circ J; 1968 Mar; 32(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 4233845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Diagnostic reliability of ECG processing by multivariate analysis.
    Brohet C; Richman HG
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():209-13. PubMed ID: 132098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The vectorcardiographic patterns of unusual conduction disturbance in infancy and childhood.
    Khoury GH; Fowler RS
    Am Heart J; 1968 Feb; 75(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 4283617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. V.C.G. diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction.
    Pahlajani DB; Govindan V; Buch VR; Gandhi MJ
    Indian Heart J; 1973 Jan; 25(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 4268196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Statistical evaluation of vectorcardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of posterior myocardial necrosis (author's transl)].
    Fischer DM; Benini A; Scudelotti O; Pirazzini L; Finzi CM
    G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(11):1075-9. PubMed ID: 144634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The relation of the conventional electrocardiogram to orthogonal leads. With special reference to ventricular hypertrophy.
    Mizuno Y; Yasui S
    Jpn Circ J; 1967 Nov; 31(11):1634-9. PubMed ID: 4230798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Multigroup diagnostic classification with a new 'maximal' lead system.
    Kornreich F; Block P; Bourgain R; Lanckriet J; Tiberghien J; Lenders P; Smets P; Reygaert P; Crabbe JP; Raadschelders I
    Adv Cardiol; 1976; 16():121-7. PubMed ID: 132096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Why you should include vectorcardiography.
    Silk AD
    Med Times; 1970 Oct; 98(10):79-81. PubMed ID: 4248358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Assessment of the right ventricular hypertrophy by means of computer analysis of the vectorcardiogram].
    Csanády M; Högye M; Gaäl T; Hunya P
    Z Exp Chir; 1973; 6(5):307-12. PubMed ID: 4275981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms.
    Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Pipberger HV
    Comput Biomed Res; 1973 Feb; 6(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 4266618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.