BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14579345)

  • 21. CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.
    Fischer D; Barret C; Bryson K; Elofsson A; Godzik A; Jones D; Karplus KJ; Kelley LA; MacCallum RM; Pawowski K; Rost B; Rychlewski L; Sternberg M
    Proteins; 1999; Suppl 3():209-17. PubMed ID: 10526371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Better prediction of sub-cellular localization by combining evolutionary and structural information.
    Nair R; Rost B
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):917-30. PubMed ID: 14635133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP5.
    Melamud E; Moult J
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():561-5. PubMed ID: 14579346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition.
    McGuffin LJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():345. PubMed ID: 17877795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AutoSCOP: automated prediction of SCOP classifications using unique pattern-class mappings.
    Gewehr JE; Hintermair V; Zimmer R
    Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 23(10):1203-10. PubMed ID: 17379694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Getting past appearances: the many-fold consequences of remote homology.
    Lichtarge O
    Nat Struct Biol; 2001 Nov; 8(11):918-20. PubMed ID: 11685232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting disulfide connectivity from protein sequence using multiple sequence feature vectors and secondary structure.
    Song J; Yuan Z; Tan H; Huber T; Burrage K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3147-54. PubMed ID: 17942444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fams-ace: a combined method to select the best model after remodeling all server models.
    Terashi G; Takeda-Shitaka M; Kanou K; Iwadate M; Takaya D; Hosoi A; Ohta K; Umeyama H
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():98-107. PubMed ID: 17894329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. YASSPP: better kernels and coding schemes lead to improvements in protein secondary structure prediction.
    Karypis G
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):575-86. PubMed ID: 16763996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fold recognition and accurate sequence-structure alignment of sequences directing beta-sheet proteins.
    McDonnell AV; Menke M; Palmer N; King J; Cowen L; Berger B
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):976-85. PubMed ID: 16547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of protein fold comparison servers.
    Novotny M; Madsen D; Kleywegt GJ
    Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 14696188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of pi-turns in proteins using PSI-BLAST profiles and secondary structure information.
    Wang Y; Xue ZD; Shi XH; Xu J
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Sep; 347(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 16844090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data.
    Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Predicting protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility with an improved multiple linear regression method.
    Qin S; He Y; Pan XM
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(3):473-80. PubMed ID: 16152601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An introduction to protein contact prediction.
    Hamilton N; Huber T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():87-104. PubMed ID: 18712298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction.
    Kolodny R; Petrey D; Honig B
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 16678402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhanced protein fold recognition using a structural alphabet.
    Deschavanne P; Tufféry P
    Proteins; 2009 Jul; 76(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 19089985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Empirical limits for template-based protein structure prediction: the CASP5 example.
    Contreras-Moreira B; Ezkurdia I; Tress ML; Valencia A
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Feb; 579(5):1203-7. PubMed ID: 15710414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PFRES: protein fold classification by using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure.
    Chen K; Kurgan L
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2843-50. PubMed ID: 17942446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7.
    Izarzugaza JM; Graña O; Tress ML; Valencia A; Clarke ND
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():152-8. PubMed ID: 17671976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.