234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14579859)
1. Influence of setup errors on spinal cord dose and treatment plan quality for cervical spine tumours: a phantom study for photon IMRT and heavy charged particle radiotherapy.
Karger CP; Schulz-Ertner D; Didinger BH; Debus J; Jäkel O
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3171-89. PubMed ID: 14579859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment planning intercomparison for spinal chordomas using intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy (IMRT) and carbon ions.
Schulz-Ertner D; Nikoghosyan A; Didinger B; Karger CP; Jäkel O; Wannenmacher M; Debus J
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(16):2617-31. PubMed ID: 12974578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose sparing of brainstem and spinal cord for re-irradiating recurrent head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Chen CC; Lee CC; Mah D; Sharma R; Landau E; Garg M; Wu A
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20202815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Helical tomotherapy-based STAT RT: Dosimetric evaluation for clinical implementation of a rapid radiation palliation program.
McIntosh A; Dunlap N; Sheng K; Geezey C; Turner B; Blackhall L; Weiss G; Lappinen E; Larner JM; Read PW
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 19944589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus proton radiotherapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases: a treatment planning study.
Rief H; Chaudhri N; Tonndorf-Martini E; Bruckner T; Rieken S; Bostel T; Förster R; Schlampp I; Debus J; Sterzing F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):186–194. PubMed ID: 26699573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine.
Jiang P; Zhang X; Wei S; Zhao T; Wang J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):22-30. PubMed ID: 32170991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re-irradiation of spinal column metastases by IMRT: impact of setup errors on the dose distribution.
Gröger C; Hautmann MG; Loeschel R; Repp N; Kölbl O; Dobler B
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Nov; 8():269. PubMed ID: 24238332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Wu QJ; Yoo S; Kirkpatrick JP; Thongphiew D; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1596-604. PubMed ID: 19733447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of dose fractionation on respiratory motion induced IMRT delivery errors: a volumetric dose measurement study.
Duan J; Shen S; Fiveash JB; Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1380-7. PubMed ID: 16752574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SBRT planning for spinal metastasis: indications from a large multicentric study.
Esposito M; Masi L; Zani M; Doro R; Fedele D; Garibaldi C; Clemente S; Fiandra C; Giglioli FR; Marino C; Orsingher L; Russo S; Stasi M; Strigari L; Villaggi E; Mancosu P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Mar; 195(3):226-235. PubMed ID: 30353349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chest wall desmoid tumours treated with definitive radiotherapy: a plan comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy.
Liu J; Ng D; Lee J; Stalley P; Hong A
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():34. PubMed ID: 26935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional portal image-based dose reconstruction in a virtual phantom for rapid evaluation of IMRT plans.
Ansbacher W
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3369-82. PubMed ID: 17022233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
