These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14579877)

  • 21. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tensile bond strength of composite to air-abraded dentin.
    Geitel B; Wischnewski R; Jahn KR; Barthel RC; Zimmer S; Roulet JF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 14753335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the polymerization contraction stress of composites photoactivated by halogen light and light-emitting diode.
    da Fonseca Roberti Garcia L; Zago Naves L; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009; 58(11-12):577-84. PubMed ID: 20027128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method.
    Park JW; Ferracane JL
    Dent Mater; 2005 Sep; 21(9):882-9. PubMed ID: 16005954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH; Kim SS; Cho YS; Lee CK; Noh BD
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15241907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microbial ingrowth around single- and multi-component adhesives studied in vitro.
    Preussker S; Klimm W; Pöschmann M; Koch R
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(5):345-51. PubMed ID: 12925825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites.
    Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):150-2. PubMed ID: 9002789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of a high-speed polymerization method on the marginal integrity of composite fillings in Class-II cavities.
    Stoll R; Kook K; Kunzelmann KH; Zöfel P; Stachniss V
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Mar; 4(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 11218515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cervical microleakage in composite restorations of primary teeth--in vitro study.
    Casagrande L; Brayner R; Barata JS; de Araujo FB
    J Dent; 2005 Sep; 33(8):627-32. PubMed ID: 16139693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of activation mode of dual-cured resin cements and low-viscosity composite liners on bond strength to dentin.
    Garcia RN; Reis AF; Giannini M
    J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):564-9. PubMed ID: 17467865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.