These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14579954)

  • 1. Load transfer by an implant in a sinus-grafted maxillary model.
    Fanuscu MI; Iida K; Caputo AA; Nishimura RD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 14579954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
    Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
    Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part II.
    Gross MD; Nissan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 11357070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution around maxillary implants in anatomic photoelastic models of varying geometry. Part I.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Samuel R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 11357069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.
    Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sinus elevation with a cortical bone graft block: a patient-specific three-dimensional finite element study.
    Schuller-Götzburg P; Entacher K; Petutschnigg A; Pomwenger W; Watzinger F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 22442776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach.
    Yu W; Jang YJ; Kyung HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19344030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
    Fermergård R; Astrand P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report.
    Kupeyan HK; Shaffner M; Armstrong J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16919024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
    Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate loading of the grafted maxillary sinus using platelet rich plasma and autogenous bone: a preliminary study with histologic and histomorphometric analysis.
    Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS
    Implant Dent; 2008 Mar; 17(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 18332759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.
    Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 14982363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.