BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14579961)

  • 1. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review.
    Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Garefis PD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 14579961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses. A literature review.
    Shadid R; Sadaqa N
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 21091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cemented-retained vs screw-retained implant restorations: an investigation on 1939 dental implants.
    Cicciù M; Beretta M; Risitano G; Maiorana C
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Apr; 57(4):167-79. PubMed ID: 18427361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screw- versus cement-retained implant restorations: current concepts.
    Lee A; Okayasu K; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20147811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cemented or screw-retained implant restorations: how do you decide?
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21613034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A crown venting technique for the cementation of implant-supported crowns.
    Schwedhelm ER; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 12589295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for registering the abutment screw position of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Figueras-Alvarez O; Cedeño R; Cano-Batalla J; Cabratosa-Termes J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20620369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new retrieval system for cement-retained implant superstructures: a technical report.
    Ichikawa T; Ishida O; Watanabe M; Tomotake Y; Wei H; Jianrong C
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):487-9. PubMed ID: 18544129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Newly Designed Screw- and Cement-Retained Prosthesis and Its Abutments.
    Heo YK; Lim YJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):612-4. PubMed ID: 26523721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement-retained superstructure for a metal-resin fixed complete denture.
    McCracken M; Simmons B; Simmons W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 15775933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs.
    Guichet DL; Caputo AA; Choi H; Sorensen JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 10795456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations.
    Karl M; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 17394911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Designing abutments for cement retained implant supported restorations.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Nov; 201(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 17099660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Oct; 201(8):501-507. PubMed ID: 17057675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.