These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14580283)
1. Dosimetric comparison of CyberKnife with other radiosurgical modalities for an ellipsoidal target. Yu C; Jozsef G; Apuzzo ML; Petrovich Z Neurosurgery; 2003 Nov; 53(5):1155-62; discussion 1162-3. PubMed ID: 14580283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large or complex brain tumors versus linear accelerator-based treatments. Dong P; Pérez-Andújar A; Pinnaduwage D; Braunstein S; Theodosopoulos P; McDermott M; Sneed P; Ma L J Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 125(Suppl 1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27903198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric comparison of three photon radiosurgery techniques for an elongated ellipsoid target. Yu C; Luxton G; Jozsef G; Apuzzo ML; Petrovich Z Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):817-26. PubMed ID: 10524439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of radiation dose spillage from the Gamma Knife Perfexion with that from volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery during treatment of multiple brain metastases in a single fraction. McDonald D; Schuler J; Takacs I; Peng J; Jenrette J; Vanek K J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl():51-9. PubMed ID: 25434937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multiple noncoplanar arcs. Audet C; Poffenbarger BA; Chang P; Jackson PS; Lundahl RE; Ryu SI; Ray GR Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):5863-72. PubMed ID: 22047350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases. Han EY; Wang H; Luo D; Li J; Wang X J Neurosurg; 2020 May; 132(5):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30952125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing gamma knife and cyberknife in patients with brain metastases. Sio TT; Jang S; Lee SW; Curran B; Pyakuryal AP; Sternick ES J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 15(1):4095. PubMed ID: 24423830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric study using different leaf-width MLCs for treatment planning of dynamic conformal arcs and intensity-modulated radiosurgery. Jin JY; Yin FF; Ryu S; Ajlouni M; Kim JH Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):405-11. PubMed ID: 15789586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated treatment delivery system for CSRS and CSRT and clinical applications. Shiu A; Parker B; Ye JS; Lii J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(4):261-73. PubMed ID: 14604415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dosimetric comparison of fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treating intermediate intracranial lesions. Ma L; Xia P; Verhey LJ; Boyer AL Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1325-30. PubMed ID: 10613329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study. Weber DC; Bogner J; Verwey J; Georg D; Dieckmann K; Escudé L; Caro M; Pötter R; Goitein G; Lomax AJ; Miralbell R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 16168832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study on dosimetric parameters for stereotactic radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Sankaranarayanan V; Ganesan S; Oommen S; Padmanaban TK; Stumpf J; Ayyangar KM Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 12804705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic arc radiosurgery field shaping: a comparison with static field conformal and noncoplanar circular arcs. Solberg TD; Boedeker KL; Fogg R; Selch MT; DeSalles AA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Apr; 49(5):1481-91. PubMed ID: 11286857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis. Wang J; Zheng Q; Wang Y; Wang C; Xu S; Ju Z; Pan L; Bai J; Liu Y; Qu B; Dai X BMC Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(1):936. PubMed ID: 39090564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose gradient near target-normal structure interface for nonisocentric CyberKnife and isocentric intensity-modulated body radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Hossain S; Xia P; Huang K; Descovich M; Chuang C; Gottschalk AR; Roach M; Ma L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Sep; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 20133073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastases. Clark GM; Popple RA; Young PE; Fiveash JB Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):296-302. PubMed ID: 19836151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions. Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of collimator size on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the cyberknife. Hamamoto Y; Manabe T; Nishizaki O; Takahashi T; Isshiki N; Murayama S; Nishina K; Umeda M Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 15648464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal Brain Sparing With Increasing Number of Beams and Isocenters in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Beam Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases. Hossain S; Keeling V; Hildebrand K; Ahmad S; Larson DA; Sahgal A; Ma L Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):766-771. PubMed ID: 26596914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radiosurgery planning modalities for acoustic neuroma with regard to conformity and mean target dose. Perks JR; El-Hamri K; Blackburn TP; Plowman PN Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2005; 83(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 16319520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]