223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14581708)
1. Preparing the wound for healing: the effect of activated polyacrylate dressing on debridement.
Paustian C; Stegman MR
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Sep; 49(9):34-42. PubMed ID: 14581708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enzymatic wound debridement.
Ramundo J; Gray M
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 18496083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of a clear absorbent acrylic dressing for debridement.
Schimmelpfenning D; Mollenhauer S
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2006; 33(6):639-42; discussion 642-3. PubMed ID: 17108775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Hydrofilm and Hydrofilm Plus in the community: an assessment.
Palfreyman S; Stevens J
Br J Community Nurs; 2010 Mar; 15(3):S34, S36-40. PubMed ID: 20220638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydropolymer dressings in the management of wound exudate.
Carter K
Br J Community Nurs; 2003; 8(9 Suppl):suppl 10-6. PubMed ID: 14685964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of wound-bed preparation in managing chronic pressure ulcers.
Romanelli M; Mastronicola D
J Wound Care; 2002 Sep; 11(8):305-10. PubMed ID: 12360764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and scientific data of a hydropolymer range of dressings.
Ballard K
Br J Nurs; 2002 Nov; 11(20 Suppl):S37-S39, S42-S43. PubMed ID: 12476151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating the use of Aquaform Hydrogel in wound management.
Trudgian J
Br J Nurs; 2000 Jul 27-Aug 9; 9(14):943-8. PubMed ID: 11261031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Debridement in practice].
Fromantin I; Charitansky H
Soins; 2007 Mar; (713):19-22. PubMed ID: 17419562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. UrgoClean: a new dressing for desloughing exuding wounds.
Kelly J; McGrath A; Wildman S
Br J Community Nurs; 2013 Jun; Suppl():S42, S44-9. PubMed ID: 24156171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Debridement: controlling the necrotic/cellular burden.
Ayello EA; Cuddigan JE
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 17(2):66-75; quiz 76-8. PubMed ID: 15021091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers.
Maume S; Van De Looverbosch D; Heyman H; Romanelli M; Ciangherotti A; Charpin S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Sep; 49(9):44-51. PubMed ID: 14581709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TIELLE* hydropolymer dressings: wound responsive technology.
Mellor J; Boothman S
Br J Community Nurs; 2003; 8(11 Suppl):14-7. PubMed ID: 15115219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. VACUTEX capillary action dressing: a multicentre, randomized trial.
Russell L; Deeth M; Jones HM; Reynolds T
Br J Nurs; 2001 Jun 28-Jul 11; 10(11 Suppl):S66-70. PubMed ID: 12146184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical cases about the therapeutic use of debriding dressing hidrodetersive polyacrylate fibers with TLC and foam dressings TLC-NOSF polyurethane in chronic wounds].
Blasco García C; Segovia Gómez T; Bermejo Martínez M; Cuesta Cuesta JJ; Alventosa Cortés AM
Rev Enferm; 2012 Oct; 35(10):9-14. PubMed ID: 23157065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study.
Jones KR; Fennie K
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Jul; 8(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 17619036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience.
Hodgson H; Davidson D; Duncan A; Guthrie J; Henderson E; MacDiarmid M; McGown K; Pollard V; Potter R; Rodgers A; Wilson A; Horner J; Doran M; Simm S; Taylor R; Rogers A; Rippon MG; Colgrave M
J Wound Care; 2017 Nov; 26(11):642-650. PubMed ID: 29131748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings.
Terrill PJ; Goh RC; Bailey MJ
J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):433-8. PubMed ID: 18065019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exudate-handling mechanisms of two foam-film dressings.
Thomas S; Young S
J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 18705233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
