These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14582002)

  • 1. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.
    Sherratt TN; Beatty CD
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics.
    Franks DW; Ruxton GD; Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):256-67. PubMed ID: 18786193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities.
    Beatty CD; Beirinckx K; Sherratt TN
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7004):63-6. PubMed ID: 15343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence.
    Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
    Endler JA; Mappes J
    Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness.
    Merilaita S; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
    Sherratt TN; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2004 May; 228(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 15094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.
    Rowland HM; Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J; Speed MP
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7149):64-7. PubMed ID: 17611539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do unprofitable prey evolve traits that profitable prey find difficult to exploit?
    Sherratt TN; Franks DW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Nov; 272(1579):2441-7. PubMed ID: 16243687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry.
    Rowland HM; Mappes J; Ruxton GD; Speed MP
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Dec; 13(12):1494-502. PubMed ID: 20955507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mimicry among Unequally Defended Prey Should Be Mutualistic When Predators Sample Optimally.
    Aubier TG; Joron M; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):267-282. PubMed ID: 28221836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical test of signal detection theory as it applies to Batesian mimicry.
    McGuire L; Van Gossum H; Beirinckx K; Sherratt TN
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 16938412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The coevolution of warning signals.
    Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 269(1492):741-6. PubMed ID: 11934367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antagonistic evolution in an aposematic predator-prey signaling system.
    Speed MP; Franks DW
    Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):2996-3007. PubMed ID: 25132560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costs of Learning and the Evolution of Mimetic Signals.
    Kikuchi DW; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2015 Sep; 186(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 26655351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.