382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14582373)
1. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Refinements to the system accreditation option.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 May; 26(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 16739383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Top compliance issues for first half of 2003.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Nov; 23(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 14635406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Top standards compliance issues for the first half of 2010.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 Sep; 30(9):3-8. PubMed ID: 21313931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the periodic performance review as a continuous standards compliance tool.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New accreditation product approved for systems under the ambulatory and home care programs.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 May; 25(5):8. PubMed ID: 15969299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality managers: periodic performance review can be a powerful quality tool. Don't hesitate to put your processes under the microscope.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 15338822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JCAHO evaluation plan expanded for Shared Visions-New Pathways.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 14746101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Random unannounced survey topics for 1999.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1998; 18(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 10338962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Team identifies ways to mitigate risks in new accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 14746096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Corrections to 2004 requirements.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jun; 24(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 15282888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conquering performance improvement documentation for JCAHO.
Holmes RL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Jun; 30(6):18-9, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 10180443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Top Type I recommendations for 2000. "Nutritional assessment" listed for hospitals, behavioral health, and home care.
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2001 Jul; 17(11):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 11447894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protocols for information-driven surveys.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 11215069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
