201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14582376)
1. Sample sizes set for organization assessment of compliance.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):9-10. PubMed ID: 14582376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the periodic performance review as a continuous standards compliance tool.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year.
McLaughlin S
Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Top compliance issues for all of 2003.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 May; 24(5):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 15168568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. JCAHO, unannounced: just-surveyed organizations share compliance tips.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2006 Apr; 31(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16617920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Simplifying compliance activities.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11270206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. JCAHO offers two alternative ways to fulfill the periodic performance review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Oct; 23(10):1-5. PubMed ID: 14582373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 2005 thresholds for Conditional Accreditation and Preliminary Denial of Accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):3. PubMed ID: 15587168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compliance data for the Joint Commission's 2003 National Patient Safety Goals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 15484657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Top standards compliance issues for first half of 2008.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Mar; 29(3):6. PubMed ID: 19343994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoring definitions revised for all accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Feb; 21(2):5. PubMed ID: 11246634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality managers: periodic performance review can be a powerful quality tool. Don't hesitate to put your processes under the microscope.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Aug; 29(8):105-8. PubMed ID: 15338822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Top standards compliance issues for first half of 2007.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Feb; 28(2):1, 3. PubMed ID: 18369025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How SII may affect your PPR.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Top type 1s for all of 2001. Common problem areas identified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 May; 22(5):4-5. PubMed ID: 12016718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint Commission identifies top standards compliance issues for 2011.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2012 Apr; 32(4):1, 6. PubMed ID: 22594164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Update: additional scoring changes for all 2009 accreditation manuals.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Jun; 29(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 19579473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
