218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14582504)
1. [Quality control of culture media for mycobacterium drug sensitivity tests].
Kekkaku; 2003 Aug; 78(8):563-8. PubMed ID: 14582504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Testing Mycobacterium tuberculosis for drug sensitivity using different methods].
Skriagina EM; Zalutskaia OM; Roth A; Mauch H; Nikolenko EN
Probl Tuberk; 2001; (5):43-5. PubMed ID: 11588962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Drug sensitivity of atypical Mycobacteria isolated from patients to antitubercular agents of the first and second order].
Makarevich NM; Rudoĭ NM
Antibiotiki; 1971 Feb; 16(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 4326726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Drug sensitivity of the so-called atypical mycobacteria].
Lucchesi M; Mancini P; Matzeu M
Ann Ist Carlo Forlanini; 1968; 28(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 4314838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Culture and susceptibility testing of mycobacteria with VersaTREK].
Gravet A; Souillard N; Habermacher J; Moser A; Lohmann C; Schmitt F; Delarbre JM
Pathol Biol (Paris); 2011 Feb; 59(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 20850229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sensitivity tests of mycobacteria to INH, SM, EMB and RMP in a semi-liquid serum-sauton-agar (author's transl)].
Neubert R
Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1976; 144(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 823718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Primary resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the province of Vizcaya].
Echeverría MJ; Ayarza R; Jiménez MS; López de Goicoechea MJ; Berdonces P; Ibarretxebea AB
Rev Esp Quimioter; 1999 Jun; 12(2):152-3. PubMed ID: 10562678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Rapid visual test for the determination of drug resistance in comparison with the economic test].
Reutgen H; Kalich R
Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1974; 140(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 4499423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Study of primary resistance to antitubercular agents in the Sousse region, 1981-1990].
Benzarti M; Garrouche A; Jerray M; Hayouni A; Maalel K; Klabi N
Tunis Med; 1996 Jan; 74(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 9507309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The "in vitro" activity of rifampicin compared with ethambutol, capreomycin and isoniazid.
Steinbrück PW
Acta Tuberc Pneumol Belg; 1969; 60(3):413-6. PubMed ID: 4984421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the MB/BacT Mycobacterium detection system and the BACTEC MGIT 960 system in comparison with the BACTEC 460TB system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Garrigó M; Aragón LM; Alcaide F; Borrell S; Cardeñosa E; Galán JJ; Gonzalez-Martín J; Martin-Casabona N; Moreno C; Salvado M; Coll P
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1766-70. PubMed ID: 17442793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro synergistic activity of ethambutol, isoniazid, kanamycin, rifampin, and streptomycin against Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex.
Zimmer BL; DeYoung DR; Roberts GD
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Jul; 22(1):148-50. PubMed ID: 7125626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous detection of isoniazid, rifampin, and ethambutol resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a single multiplex allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.
Yang Z; Durmaz R; Yang D; Gunal S; Zhang L; Foxman B; Sanic A; Marrs CF
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2005 Nov; 53(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 16243477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [BACTEC MGIT 960 system for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a study using external quality assessment strains].
Kobayashi I; Abe C; Mitarai S
Kekkaku; 2006 Feb; 81(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 16529006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro drug sensitivity of M. avium-intracellulare complex in the presence and absence of dimethyl sulphoxide.
Nash DR; Steingrube VA
Microbios; 1982; 35(140):71-8. PubMed ID: 7162431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Studies on atypical mycobacteria. X. Experimental approach to the etiology of atypical mycobacteriosis.
Ogawa T; Motomura K
Kekkaku; 1971 Sep; 46(9):365-70. PubMed ID: 5122006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative determinations of Mycobacterium resistance using the vertical diffusion test and the proportion method (economical test)].
Kalich R; Nitschke M; Ulber H; Mydlak G; Werner E; Gerloff W; Reinhold L
Z Erkr Atmungsorgane; 1974; 140(3):242-52. PubMed ID: 4142152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: comparison of the BACTEC TB-460 method and flow cytometric assay with the proportion method.
DeCoster DJ; Vena RM; Callister SM; Schell RF
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2005 May; 11(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 15819863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of correlation between embB mutation and ethambutol MIC in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from China.
Shi R; Zhang J; Otomo K; Zhang G; Sugawara I
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Dec; 51(12):4515-7. PubMed ID: 17846128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Drug resistance in tuberculosis in Delhi: a 2 year profile (2001--2002).
Negi SS; Gupta S; Lal S
J Commun Dis; 2003 Jun; 35(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 15562952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
