224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14582718)
1. The LNT model is the best we can do--today.
Preston RJ
J Radiol Prot; 2003 Sep; 23(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 14582718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
Breckow J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A contribution to the linear no-threshold discussion.
Chadwick KH; Leenhouts HP; Brugmans MJ
J Radiol Prot; 2003 Mar; 23(1):53-77. PubMed ID: 12729419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Progress in low dose health risk research: Novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology.
Averbeck D; Salomaa S; Bouffler S; Ottolenghi A; Smyth V; Sabatier L
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res; 2018; 776():46-69. PubMed ID: 29807577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ionizing radiation].
Masse R
C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Jul; 323(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 10983274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
Scott BR
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re-evaluation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model using new paradigms and modern molecular studies.
Tharmalingam S; Sreetharan S; Brooks AL; Boreham DR
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():54-67. PubMed ID: 30763548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bystander effects, genomic instability, adaptive response, and cancer risk assessment for radiation and chemical exposures.
Preston RJ
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):550-6. PubMed ID: 15979669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The state of the art in the 1990's: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose-response relationship for ionizing radiation.
Upton AC;
Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12852466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
