103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14584110)
1. Hemodynamical assessment of cavernous hemangioma in cavernous sinus using MR-DSA and conventional DSA.
Shim YW; Chung TS; Kang WS; Lee KS; Strecker R; Hennig J
Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 14584110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of source images from three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography after treatment of cavernous dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ikushima I; Shigematsu Y; Morishita S; Yamashita Y
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):205-9. PubMed ID: 14632295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma: imaging features and therapeutic effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Anqi X; Zhang S; Jiahe X; Chao Y
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 127():59-64. PubMed ID: 25459244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction catheter angiography for follow-up of coiled aneurysms: do we need both?
Lane A; Vivian P; Coulthard A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25857748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.
Ferré JC; Carsin-Nicol B; Morandi X; Carsin M; de Kersaint-Gilly A; Gauvrit JY; Desal HA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 18809272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified magnetic resonance angiography of the liver using sensitivity encoding in comparison with digital subtraction angiography and CT arterial portography.
Yan SX; Liang TB; Fujii M; Kawamitsu H; Sugimura K; Zheng SS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 May; 4(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 15908313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hepatic hemangioma with arterioportal shunt: Prevalence and lesion characteristics based on DSA, CT and MR imaging.
Makamure J; Zhao D; Liu Y; Wang Y; Zheng C; Liang B
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108715. PubMed ID: 31677545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of noninvasive neurovascular imaging modalities in stroke patients: patterns of use and impact on need for digital subtraction angiography.
Hassan AE; Rostambeigi N; Chaudhry SA; Khan AA; Zacharatos H; Khatri R; Uzun G; Qureshi AI
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 22(7):e53-8. PubMed ID: 22578916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coil-treated aneurysms: decision making regarding additional treatment based on findings of MR angiography and intraarterial DSA.
Schaafsma JD; Velthuis BK; van den Berg R; Brouwer PA; Majoie CB; Barkhof F; Eshghi O; de Kort GA; Lo RT; Sprengers ME; van Rooij WJ; Bot JC; Rinkel GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):858-63. PubMed ID: 23012464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of 3D DSA-MR fusion imaging in the pretreatment evaluation of brain arteriovenous malformations.
Ide S; Hirai T; Morioka M; Kai Y; Yano S; Kawano T; Tochihara S; Shigematsu Y; Uetani H; Murakami Y; Watanabe K; Yamashita Y
Acad Radiol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1345-52. PubMed ID: 22951112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traumatic carotid-cavernous fistula identified by three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography--technical note.
Ishida F; Kojima T; Kawaguchi K; Hoshino T; Murao K; Taki W
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2003 Jul; 43(7):369-72; discussion 373. PubMed ID: 12924600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Giant cavernous haemangioma in cavernous sinus.
Rabelo NN; Chaves PHS; Oliveira MA; Silva LUMAD; Pinto MB
Br J Neurosurg; 2024 Apr; 38(2):534-535. PubMed ID: 32959687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
