183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14584538)
1. Managed care and ERISA: synopsis and case law review.
Gerbasi JB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 14584538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
Jost TS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ERISA litigation and physician autonomy.
Jacobson PD; Pomfret SD
JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(7):921-6. PubMed ID: 10685718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The states, Congress, or the courts: who will be first to reform ERISA remedies?
Rooney CD
Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():73-106. PubMed ID: 10187382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case law update. State law negligence actions against MCOs are pre-empted by ERISA.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 20196010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
Trueman DL
J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
Trueman DL
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Employee Retirement Income Security Act and managed care: current issues and their impact on medical practice.
Weiss LD; Martinez JA; LeCesne BG
South Med J; 1999 Nov; 92(11):1049-53. PubMed ID: 10586829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability.
Ruger TW
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Implications of ERISA for health benefits and the number of self-funded ERISA plans.
Copeland C; Pierron B
EBRI Issue Brief; 1998 Jan; (193):1-26. PubMed ID: 10177290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Managed care liability and ERISA preemption.
Rakich JS; Ledbetter RK
Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11009731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Bipartisan Patient Protection Act: greater liability on managed care plans.
Mayers UW
Ann Health Law; 2003; 12(2):341-65, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12856463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Law & Psychiatry: Overcoming ERISA as a barrier to managed care organizations' liability for utilization review decisions.
Petrila J
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Jul; 54(7):945-6. PubMed ID: 12851428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Managed care, liability, and ERISA.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10083942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 86(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 8659664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
