These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14584711)

  • 21. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive group sequential test for clinical trials with changing patient population.
    Feng H; Shao J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1227-38. PubMed ID: 18027228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal two-stage designs for clinical trials based on safety and efficacy.
    Thall PF; Cheng SC
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 11276033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Design and analysis of group sequential logrank tests in maximum duration versus information trials.
    Kim K; Boucher H; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 7548714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of methods for adaptive treatment selection.
    Friede T; Stallard N
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):767-81. PubMed ID: 18932136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Designs for phase II trials allowing for a trade-off between response and toxicity.
    Conaway MR; Petroni GR
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1375-86. PubMed ID: 8962459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of two methods for adaptive interim analyses in clinical trials.
    Wassmer G
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):696-705. PubMed ID: 9629649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Over-ruling a group sequential boundary--a stopping rule versus a guideline.
    Lan KK; Lachin JM; Bautista O
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3347-55. PubMed ID: 14566919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comment on interim analyses in crossover trials.
    Grieve AP; Senn S
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1515-20. PubMed ID: 9019232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Strategies for including patients recruited during interim analysis of clinical trials.
    Faldum A; Hommel G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1211-25. PubMed ID: 18027227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Dunnett-Bonferroni-based parallel gatekeeping procedure for dose-response clinical trials with multiple endpoints.
    Xu H; Nuamah I; Liu J; Lim P; Sampson A
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):301-16. PubMed ID: 19065544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
    Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Symmetric group sequential test designs.
    Emerson SS; Fleming TR
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):905-23. PubMed ID: 2675998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accounting for interim safety monitoring of an adverse event upon termination of a clinical trial.
    Dallas MJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(4):631-8; discussion 439-45. PubMed ID: 18607795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Group sequential comparison of changes: ad-hoc versus more exact method.
    Lee JW; DeMets DL
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 7766776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
    Gillen DL; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stopping a clinical trial very early based on unplanned interim analyses: a group sequential approach.
    Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1152-62. PubMed ID: 7548699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.