These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14585010)

  • 1. On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible.
    Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 14585010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003).
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Ruthroff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 14640843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003).
    Greenwald AG; Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):632-6. PubMed ID: 15161391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005).
    Greenwald AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):221-5. PubMed ID: 15709875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW; Allen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):396-409. PubMed ID: 11999862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance.
    Halvorson KM; Ebner H; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):413-32. PubMed ID: 22866763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confirming and disconfirming theories about ideomotor compatibility in dual-task performance: a reply to Greenwald (2005).
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):226-9. PubMed ID: 15709876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses.
    Huestegge L; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 19331493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al. (2002).
    Fernandez-Duque D; Thornton IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):846-58. PubMed ID: 14585009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1080-94. PubMed ID: 14709228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory executive functioning.
    Hunt AR; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 15177806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
    Mayer AR; Franco AR; Canive J; Harrington DL
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 May; 19(5):993-1007. PubMed ID: 18787235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.