These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14585021)

  • 1. Absence of perceptual processing during reconfiguration of task set.
    Oriet C; Jolcoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1036-49. PubMed ID: 14585021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention.
    Keren G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1976 Dec; 105(4):349-74. PubMed ID: 1003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The psychological refractory period of stopping.
    Horstmann G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):965-81. PubMed ID: 14585017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Poboka D; Heathcote A; Michie PT
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):540-54. PubMed ID: 16176376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operation compatibility: a neglected contribution to dual-task costs.
    Pannebakker MM; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):447-60. PubMed ID: 19331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Components of task-set reconfiguration: differential effects of 'switch-to' and 'switch-away' cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Davies A; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1121(1):160-76. PubMed ID: 17010947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):343-67. PubMed ID: 16131268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual search is postponed during the attentional blink until the system is suitably reconfigured.
    Ghorashi SM; Smilek D; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17311483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of response-conflict monitoring and individual differences in response control and behavioral control: an electrophysiological investigation using a stop-signal task.
    Stahl J; Gibbons H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):581-96. PubMed ID: 17188565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.