132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14585254)
1. Impact of Closed-Loop Stimulation, overdrive pacing, DDDR pacing mode on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in Brady-Tachy Syndrome. A randomized study.
Puglisi A; Altamura G; Capestro F; Castaldi B; Critelli G; Favale S; Pavia L; Pettinati G
Eur Heart J; 2003 Nov; 24(21):1952-61. PubMed ID: 14585254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome.
Azzolini P; Critelli G; De Giorgi V; Del Giudice GB; Ibba G; Melissano D; Scaccia A; Puglisi A
Europace; 2006 Jul; 8(7):474-81. PubMed ID: 16798759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overdrive versus conventional or closed-loop rate modulation pacing in the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias in Brady-Tachy syndrome: on behalf of the Burden II Study Group.
Puglisi A; Favale S; Scipione P; Melissano D; Pavia L; Ascani F; Elia M; Scaccia A; Sagone A; Castaldi B; Musacchio E; Botto GL;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1443-55. PubMed ID: 18950302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of concomitant drug therapy on the efficacy of atrial overdrive stimulation for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias.
Konz KH; Danilovic D; Brachmann J; Attuel P; el Allaf D; John C; Malinowski K; Le Blanc U; Szendey I; Schibgilla V; Motzke T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):272-7. PubMed ID: 12687827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complexe number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: a randomized prospective cross over study.
Ricci R; Santini M; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Capucci A; Pignalberi C; Boriani G; Botto GL; Spampinato A; Bellocci F; Proclemer A; Grammatico A; de Seta F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 5(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11248773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A controlled study on the effect of verapamil on atrial tachycaarrhythmias in patients with brady-tachy syndrome implanted with a DDDR pacemaker.
Boriani G; Bertaglia E; Carboni A; Latini R; Biffi M; Martignani C; Sciotto F; Branzi A
Int J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 104(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16137513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence: a prospective, multicentre study.
Bellocci F; Spampinato A; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Capucci A; Dini P; Boriani G; Botto G; Curnis A; Moracchini PV; Nicotra G; Lisi F; Nigro P
Europace; 1999 Oct; 1(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 11220558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The DDDR closed loop stimulation for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: results from the INVASY prospective feasibility registry.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Vassanelli C;
Europace; 2003 Apr; 5(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12633640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of consistent atrial pacing algorithm for suppression of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrial fibrillation.
Miki Y; Ishikawa T; Inoue N; Yamakawa Y; Kobayashi T; Matsushita K; Matsumoto K; Taima M; Kosuge M; Sumita S; Uchino K; Kimura K; Umemura S
Int Heart J; 2008 May; 49(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 18612185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Closed-loop cardiac pacing vs. conventional dual-chamber pacing with specialized sensing and pacing algorithms for syncope prevention in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope: results of a long-term follow-up.
Palmisano P; Zaccaria M; Luzzi G; Nacci F; Anaclerio M; Favale S
Europace; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22247273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of closed-loop stimulation vs. DDD pacing on haemodynamic variations and occurrence of syncope induced by head-up tilt test in older patients with refractory cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope: the Tilt test-Induced REsponse in Closed-loop Stimulation multicentre, prospective, single blind, randomized study.
Palmisano P; Dell'Era G; Russo V; Zaccaria M; Mangia R; Bortnik M; De Vecchi F; Giubertoni A; Patti F; Magnani A; Nigro G; Rago A; Occhetta E; Accogli M
Europace; 2018 May; 20(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 28407148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-Chamber Pacing With Closed Loop Stimulation in Recurrent Reflex Vasovagal Syncope: The SPAIN Study.
Baron-Esquivias G; Morillo CA; Moya-Mitjans A; Martinez-Alday J; Ruiz-Granell R; Lacunza-Ruiz J; Garcia-Civera R; Gutierrez-Carretero E; Romero-Garrido R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 70(14):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 28958328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autonomic function during closed loop stimulation and fixed rate pacing: heart rate variability analysis from 24-hour Holter recordings.
Quaglione R; Calcagnini G; Censi F; Piccirilli F; Iannucci L; Raveggi M; Biancalana G; Bartolini P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Mar; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 19889189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closed loop stimulation in prevention of vasovagal syncope. Inotropy Controlled Pacing in Vasovagal Syncope (INVASY): a multicentre randomized, single blind, controlled study.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Audoglio R; Vassanelli C;
Europace; 2004 Nov; 6(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 15519257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between selected overdrive parameters and the therapeutic outcome and tolerance of atrial overdrive pacing.
Attuel P; Danilovic D; Konz KH; Brachmann J; el Allaf D; Löscher S; Gomes C; Scheibner T; Schibgilla V; Szendey I; Hartmann A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):257-63. PubMed ID: 12687824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DDD versus DDDR pacing: effects on the occurrence of atrial arrhythmias and the quality of life in patients with the sick sinus syndrome.
Schrickx HJ; Ruiter JH; Antenbrink R; Maarsse A; Sedney MI
Neth Heart J; 2002 Jan; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 25696025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
