These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14585254)
1. Impact of Closed-Loop Stimulation, overdrive pacing, DDDR pacing mode on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in Brady-Tachy Syndrome. A randomized study. Puglisi A; Altamura G; Capestro F; Castaldi B; Critelli G; Favale S; Pavia L; Pettinati G Eur Heart J; 2003 Nov; 24(21):1952-61. PubMed ID: 14585254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atrial tachyarrhythmia burden modelling by some electrophysiological parameters in pacemaker-recipient patients with Brady-Tachy syndrome. Azzolini P; Critelli G; De Giorgi V; Del Giudice GB; Ibba G; Melissano D; Scaccia A; Puglisi A Europace; 2006 Jul; 8(7):474-81. PubMed ID: 16798759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overdrive versus conventional or closed-loop rate modulation pacing in the prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias in Brady-Tachy syndrome: on behalf of the Burden II Study Group. Puglisi A; Favale S; Scipione P; Melissano D; Pavia L; Ascani F; Elia M; Scaccia A; Sagone A; Castaldi B; Musacchio E; Botto GL; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1443-55. PubMed ID: 18950302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of concomitant drug therapy on the efficacy of atrial overdrive stimulation for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Konz KH; Danilovic D; Brachmann J; Attuel P; el Allaf D; John C; Malinowski K; Le Blanc U; Szendey I; Schibgilla V; Motzke T Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):272-7. PubMed ID: 12687827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome. Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complexe number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: a randomized prospective cross over study. Ricci R; Santini M; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Capucci A; Pignalberi C; Boriani G; Botto GL; Spampinato A; Bellocci F; Proclemer A; Grammatico A; de Seta F J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 5(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11248773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A controlled study on the effect of verapamil on atrial tachycaarrhythmias in patients with brady-tachy syndrome implanted with a DDDR pacemaker. Boriani G; Bertaglia E; Carboni A; Latini R; Biffi M; Martignani C; Sciotto F; Branzi A Int J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 104(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16137513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence: a prospective, multicentre study. Bellocci F; Spampinato A; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Capucci A; Dini P; Boriani G; Botto G; Curnis A; Moracchini PV; Nicotra G; Lisi F; Nigro P Europace; 1999 Oct; 1(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 11220558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The DDDR closed loop stimulation for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: results from the INVASY prospective feasibility registry. Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Vassanelli C; Europace; 2003 Apr; 5(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12633640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of consistent atrial pacing algorithm for suppression of atrial arrhythmias in patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrial fibrillation. Miki Y; Ishikawa T; Inoue N; Yamakawa Y; Kobayashi T; Matsushita K; Matsumoto K; Taima M; Kosuge M; Sumita S; Uchino K; Kimura K; Umemura S Int Heart J; 2008 May; 49(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 18612185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Closed-loop cardiac pacing vs. conventional dual-chamber pacing with specialized sensing and pacing algorithms for syncope prevention in patients with refractory vasovagal syncope: results of a long-term follow-up. Palmisano P; Zaccaria M; Luzzi G; Nacci F; Anaclerio M; Favale S Europace; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22247273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of closed-loop stimulation vs. DDD pacing on haemodynamic variations and occurrence of syncope induced by head-up tilt test in older patients with refractory cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope: the Tilt test-Induced REsponse in Closed-loop Stimulation multicentre, prospective, single blind, randomized study. Palmisano P; Dell'Era G; Russo V; Zaccaria M; Mangia R; Bortnik M; De Vecchi F; Giubertoni A; Patti F; Magnani A; Nigro G; Rago A; Occhetta E; Accogli M Europace; 2018 May; 20(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 28407148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closed loop stimulation reduces the incidence of atrial high-rate episodes compared with conventional rate-adaptive pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunctions. Pisanò ECL; Calvi V; Viscusi M; Rapacciuolo A; Lazzari L; Bontempi L; Pelargonio G; Arena G; Caccavo V; Wang CC; Merkely B; Lin LY; Oh IY; Bertaglia E; Saporito D; Menichelli M; Nicosia A; Carretta DM; Coppolino A; Ching CK; Del Castillo ÁM; Su X; Del Maestro M; Giacopelli D; Gargaro A; Botto GL Europace; 2024 Jul; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 38938169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-Chamber Pacing With Closed Loop Stimulation in Recurrent Reflex Vasovagal Syncope: The SPAIN Study. Baron-Esquivias G; Morillo CA; Moya-Mitjans A; Martinez-Alday J; Ruiz-Granell R; Lacunza-Ruiz J; Garcia-Civera R; Gutierrez-Carretero E; Romero-Garrido R J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 70(14):1720-1728. PubMed ID: 28958328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autonomic function during closed loop stimulation and fixed rate pacing: heart rate variability analysis from 24-hour Holter recordings. Quaglione R; Calcagnini G; Censi F; Piccirilli F; Iannucci L; Raveggi M; Biancalana G; Bartolini P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Mar; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 19889189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Closed loop stimulation in prevention of vasovagal syncope. Inotropy Controlled Pacing in Vasovagal Syncope (INVASY): a multicentre randomized, single blind, controlled study. Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Audoglio R; Vassanelli C; Europace; 2004 Nov; 6(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 15519257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between selected overdrive parameters and the therapeutic outcome and tolerance of atrial overdrive pacing. Attuel P; Danilovic D; Konz KH; Brachmann J; el Allaf D; Löscher S; Gomes C; Scheibner T; Schibgilla V; Szendey I; Hartmann A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):257-63. PubMed ID: 12687824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]