These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14585562)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance evaluation of fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implant.
    Park SW; Seol HY; Hong SJ; Kim KA; Choi JC; Cha IH
    Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 14585562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implants (Medpor) after modified evisceration.
    Huang D; Xu B; Yang Z; Xu B; Lin X; Yang X; Zhao J
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015; 31(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 25025383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary placement of a titanium motility post in a porous polyethylene orbital implant: animal model with quantitative assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth and vascular density.
    Hsu WC; Green JP; Spilker MH; Rubin PA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 16(5):370-9. PubMed ID: 11021387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging assessment of porous polyethylene orbital implant (Medpor).
    De Potter P; Duprez T; Cosnard G
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1656-60. PubMed ID: 10964823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Choi HY; Lee JS; Park HJ; Oum BS; Kim HJ; Park DY
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006; 34(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 16764656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Rubin PA; Popham JK; Bilyk JR; Shore JW
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Jun; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 7522048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants.
    Son J; Kim CS; Yang J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sucralfate and basic fibroblast growth factor on fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene alloplastic implants using a novel rabbit model.
    Rubin PA; Nicaeus TE; Warner MA; Remulla HD
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Mar; 13(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 9076777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of early fibrovascular proliferation according to orbital implant in orbital floor fracture reconstruction.
    Lee H; Baek S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1518-23. PubMed ID: 22976649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinicopathologic reports, case reports, and small case series: fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene orbital floor implants in humans.
    Patel PJ; Rees HC; Olver JM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 121(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 12617713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vascularization of coralline versus synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants assessed by gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Celik T; Yuksel D; Kosker M; Kasim R; Simsek S
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Mar; 40(3):346-53. PubMed ID: 24871378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
    Spirnak JP; Nieves N; Hollsten DA; White WC; Betz TA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 119(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 7535979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
    De Potter P; Shields CL; Shields JA; Flanders AE; Rao VM
    Ophthalmology; 1992 May; 99(5):824-30. PubMed ID: 1375714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant.
    Karesh JW; Dresner SC
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Oct; 101(10):1688-95; discussion 1695-6. PubMed ID: 7936568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bovine hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a preliminary report.
    Perry JD; Goldberg RA; McCann JD; Shorr N; Engstrom R; Tong J
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jul; 18(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 12142759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of synthetic bone glass particulate on the fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene orbital implants.
    Choi HY; Lee JE; Park HJ; Oum BS
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 16550057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydroxyapatite orbital implant vascularization assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Klapper SR; Jordan DR; Ells A; Grahovac S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 19(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12544792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atraumatic Delayed Orbital Hematoma Sixteen Years After Orbital Floor Fracture Repair With Porous Polyethylene Implant.
    Slentz DH; Rajjoub L; Domanski M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):539-540. PubMed ID: 30640854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rate of vascularization and exposure of silicone-capped porous polyethylene spherical implants: an animal model.
    Kalwerisky K; Mihora L; Czyz CN; Foster JA; Holck DE
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 23811596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of fibrovascular tissue ingrowth within synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants in children.
    Galluzzi P; De Francesco S; Giacalone G; Cerase A; Monti L; Vallone IM; Lazzeretti L; Venturi C; Hadjistilianou T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 21279974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.