These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1458603)

  • 1. Unavailability of drug metabolite reference material to evaluate false-positive results for monoclonal EMIT-d.a.u. assay of amphetamine.
    Poklis A
    Clin Chem; 1992 Dec; 38(12):2560. PubMed ID: 1458603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reagent lot-to-lot variability in sensitivity for amphetamine with the Syva Emit II Monoclonal Amphetamine/Methamphetamine assay.
    Singh J
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997; 21(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 9083839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical performance evaluation of EMIT II monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay: more specificity than EMIT d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine/methamphetamine assay.
    Dasgupta A; Saldana S; Kinnaman G; Smith M; Johansen K
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 8419030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-positive results with Emit II amphetamine/methamphetamine assay in users of common psychotropic drugs.
    Smith-Kielland A; Olsen KM; Christophersen AS
    Clin Chem; 1995 Jun; 41(6 Pt 1):951-2. PubMed ID: 7768025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Buflomedil interference with the monoclonal EMIT d.a.u. amphetamine/methamphetamine immunoassay.
    Papa P; Rocchi L; Mainardi C; Donzelli G
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1997 May; 35(5):369-70. PubMed ID: 9189741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metabolites of chlorpromazine and brompheniramine may cause false-positive urine amphetamine results with monoclonal EMIT d.a.u. immunoassay.
    Olsen KM; Gulliksen M; Christophersen AS
    Clin Chem; 1992 Apr; 38(4):611-2. PubMed ID: 1568344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a new pretreatment reagent for use with the EMIT 2000 cyclosporine assay.
    Butch AW; Fukuchi AM
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Jun; 36(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 12810161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ranitidine cross-reactivity in the EMIT d.a.u. Monoclonal Amphetamine/Methamphetamine Assay.
    Kelly KL
    Clin Chem; 1990 Jul; 36(7):1391-2. PubMed ID: 2372968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ranitidine interference with standard amphetamine immunoassay.
    Liu L; Wheeler SE; Rymer JA; Lower D; Zona J; Peck Palmer OM; Tamama K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Jan; 438():307-8. PubMed ID: 25242739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced interference by phenothiazines in amphetamine drug of abuse immunoassays.
    Melanson SE; Lee-Lewandrowski E; Griggs DA; Long WH; Flood JG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Dec; 130(12):1834-8. PubMed ID: 17149959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Falsely negative urine drug assay results due to filtration.
    Mitchell JD; Perrigo BJ; Mason-Daniel VA
    Clin Chem; 1992 Dec; 38(12):2556-7. PubMed ID: 1303644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthetic sweetener cyclamate as a potential source of false-positive amphetamine results in the TDx system.
    Martz W; Schütz HW
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):2016-7. PubMed ID: 1934488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False-positive results from the Syva EMIT d.a.u. monoclonal amphetamine assay as a result of antipsychotic drug therapy.
    Crane T; Dawson CM; Tickner TR
    Clin Chem; 1993 Mar; 39(3):549. PubMed ID: 8095440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response of EMIT amphetamine immunoassays to urinary desoxyephedrine following Vicks inhaler use.
    Poklis A; Moore KA
    Ther Drug Monit; 1995 Feb; 17(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 7725384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for drugs in forensic blood samples using EMIT urine assays.
    Gjerde H; Christophersen AS; Skuterud B; Klemetsen K; Mørland J
    Forensic Sci Int; 1990 Feb; 44(2-3):179-85. PubMed ID: 2180797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False-positive postmortem EMIT drugs-of-abuse assay due to lactate dehydrogenase and lactate in urine.
    Sloop G; Hall M; Simmons GT; Robinson CA
    J Anal Toxicol; 1995; 19(7):554-6. PubMed ID: 8577177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One Hundred False-Positive Amphetamine Specimens Characterized by Liquid Chromatography Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.
    Marin SJ; Doyle K; Chang A; Concheiro-Guisan M; Huestis MA; Johnson-Davis KL
    J Anal Toxicol; 2016; 40(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 26342055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Abbott ADx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II abused drug assay: comparison to TDx, EMIT, and GC/MS methods.
    Przekop MA; Manno JE; Kunsman GW; Cockerham KR; Manno BR
    J Anal Toxicol; 1991; 15(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 1779660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between GC-MS and the EMIT II, Abbott ADx, and Roche OnLine immunoassays for the determination of THCCOOH.
    Kintz P; Machart D; Jamey C; Mangin P
    J Anal Toxicol; 1995 Sep; 19(5):304-6. PubMed ID: 7500617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrochemical homogeneous enzyme immunoassay of theophylline in hemolyzed, icteric, and lipemic samples.
    Yao H; Jenkins SH; Pesce AJ; Halsall HB; Heineman WR
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1432-4. PubMed ID: 8330402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.