These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14586350)

  • 21. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.
    El-Khayat W; Alelaiw H; El-kateb A; Elsemary A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 25694257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical baloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Tabowei TO; Oboro VO
    East Afr Med J; 2003 Feb; 80(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16167722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial.
    Osoti A; Kibii DK; Tong TMK; Maranga I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jul; 18(1):300. PubMed ID: 30001195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Foley Catheter or Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Women with Term Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Multicenter Trial.
    Kruit H; Tihtonen K; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Heikinheimo O; Paavonen J; Rahkonen L
    Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):866-72. PubMed ID: 27031055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis.
    Gagnon J; Corlin T; Berghella V; Hoffman MK; Sciscione A; Marie PS; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jul; 3(4):100350. PubMed ID: 33757937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques.
    Barrilleaux PS; Bofill JA; Terrone DA; Magann EF; May WL; Morrison JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 12066084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; McCullough H; Manley JS; Shlossman PA; Pollock M; Colmorgen GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9914578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening.
    Niromanesh S; Mosavi-Jarrahi A; Samkhaniani F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Apr; 81(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12676389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial.
    Abdi N; Alavi A; Pakbaz F; Darabi H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):533. PubMed ID: 34315413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
    Sharami SH; Milani F; Faraji R; Bloukimoghadam K; Salamat F; Momenzadeh S; Ebrahimi H
    Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
    Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method].
    Patro-Małysza J; Marciniak B; Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Bartosiewicz J; Oleszczuk J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20232696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Levine LD; Downes KL; Elovitz MA; Parry S; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 128(6):1357-1364. PubMed ID: 27824758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.