These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587574)

  • 1. On the assessment of shooting sounds: loudness-level weightings versus A- and C-weighted sound exposure levels (L).
    Vosa J; Geurtsen FW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):1729-32. PubMed ID: 14587574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced awakening probability of repetitive impulse sounds.
    Vos J; Houben MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2011-25. PubMed ID: 23967934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3330-45. PubMed ID: 1619113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the annoyance caused by impulse sounds produced by small, medium-large, and large firearms.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):244-53. PubMed ID: 11206152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A field survey on the annoyance caused by sounds from large firearms and road traffic.
    Buchta E; Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2890-902. PubMed ID: 9821337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The objective-subjective assessment of noise: young adults can estimate loudness of events and lifestyle noise.
    Beach EF; Williams W; Gilliver M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 22380619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Bak M; Fiszer M; Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 15387085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acceptable levels of tonal and broad-band repetitive and continuous sounds during the performance of nonauditory tasks.
    Landström U; Kjellberg A; Byström M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):803-16. PubMed ID: 8668437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Annoyance and discomfort during exposure to high-frequency noise from an ultrasonic washer.
    Holmberg K; Landström U; Nordström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):819-27. PubMed ID: 8668439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).
    Manohar S; Spoth J; Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():197-203. PubMed ID: 28705607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directional loudness and binaural summation for wideband and reverberant sounds.
    Sivonen VP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2852-61. PubMed ID: 17550184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impulse noise: some definitions, physical acoustics and other considerations.
    Hamernik RP; Hsueh KD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):189-96. PubMed ID: 1880288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory brainstem responses of Japanese house bats (Pipistrellus abramus) after exposure to broadband ultrasonic noise.
    Simmons AM; Boku S; Riquimaroux H; Simmons JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2430-7. PubMed ID: 26520325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.