These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587605)

  • 1. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.
    Boëx C; de Balthasar C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2049-57. PubMed ID: 14587604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing.
    Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2932-47. PubMed ID: 12509014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
    Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
    Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of apical stimulation to Mandarin speech perception in users of the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Qi B; Liu B; Krenmayr A; Liu S; Gong S; Liu H; Zhang N; Han D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jan; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 20863152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe.
    Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
    Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.
    Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2921-33. PubMed ID: 11425134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adult cochlear implant patient performance with evolving electrode technology.
    Zwolan T; Kileny PR; Smith S; Mills D; Koch D; Osberger MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2001 Nov; 22(6):844-9. PubMed ID: 11698806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
    Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners.
    Kwon BJ; van den Honert C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. PubMed ID: 16708955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner.
    van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial evaluation of the Clarion CII cochlear implant: speech perception and neural response imaging.
    Frijns JH; Briaire JJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):184-97. PubMed ID: 12072611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.