BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587606)

  • 1. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.
    Litvak LM; Smith ZM; Delgutte B; Eddington DK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2066-78. PubMed ID: 14587606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.
    Litvak LM; Delgutte B; Eddington DK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2079-98. PubMed ID: 14587607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains.
    Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):368-79. PubMed ID: 11508961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains.
    Litvak L; Delgutte B; Eddington D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2099-111. PubMed ID: 14587608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Zhang F; Jeng FC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 19205803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.
    Hu N; Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Woo J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 11(4):641-56. PubMed ID: 20632064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.
    Miller CA; Hu N; Zhang F; Robinson BK; Abbas PJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 9(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 18204987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation.
    Sly DJ; Heffer LF; White MW; Shepherd RK; Birch MG; Minter RL; Nelson NE; Wise AK; O'Leary SJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(2):510-22. PubMed ID: 17650121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation.
    Rubinstein JT; Wilson BS; Finley CC; Abbas PJ
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):108-18. PubMed ID: 9925022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.
    Hofmann M; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 11(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 20033246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Zhang F; Jeng FC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 7(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 16708257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.
    Cooper NP; Robertson D; Yates GK
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):370-86. PubMed ID: 8395584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mass Potentials Recorded at the Round Window Enable the Detection of Low Spontaneous Rate Fibers in Gerbil Auditory Nerve.
    Batrel C; Huet A; Hasselmann F; Wang J; Desmadryl G; Nouvian R; Puel JL; Bourien J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169890. PubMed ID: 28085968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unanesthetized auditory cortex exhibits multiple codes for gaps in cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 13(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 21969022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.
    Zhang F; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Abbas PJ; Hu N
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):356-72. PubMed ID: 17562109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
    Hofmann M; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of neural adaptation and degeneration on pulse-train ECAPs: A model study.
    van Gendt MJ; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():167-178. PubMed ID: 30947041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.