These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587606)

  • 41. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response.
    He S; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 20418771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold.
    Young ED; Barta PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):426-42. PubMed ID: 3950195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
    Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
    Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience.
    Cariani PA; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Sep; 76(3):1698-716. PubMed ID: 8890286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. II. Responses in the tuning curve tail.
    Joris PX; Smith PH; Yin TC
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Mar; 71(3):1037-51. PubMed ID: 8201400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A model of frequency discrimination with optimal processing of auditory nerve spike intervals.
    Hanekom JJ; Krüger JJ
    Hear Res; 2001 Jan; 151(1-2):188-204. PubMed ID: 11124465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure.
    Javel E; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):45-76. PubMed ID: 10675635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Phase Locking of Auditory Nerve Fibers: The Role of Lowpass Filtering by Hair Cells.
    Peterson AJ; Heil P
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(24):4700-4714. PubMed ID: 32376778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Characteristics of tone-pip response patterns in relationship to spontaneous rate in cat auditory nerve fibers.
    Rhode WS; Smith PH
    Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2995298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil.
    Ohlemiller KK; Echteler SM
    J Comp Physiol A; 1990 Aug; 167(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 2231475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A population study of auditory-nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats: response to pure tones.
    Kim DO; Chang SO; Sirianni JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1648-55. PubMed ID: 2341668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neural encoding of single-formant stimuli in the cat. II. Responses of anteroventral cochlear nucleus units.
    Wang X; Sachs MB
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 71(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 8158242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of the rates of pseudo-spontaneous spikes generated by electric stimuli on information transmission in an auditory nerve fiber model.
    Kumsa P; Mino H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5246-9. PubMed ID: 24110919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Delgutte B; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.