These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587606)

  • 61. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Long CJ; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1516-28. PubMed ID: 14514205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.
    Javel E; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):908-21. PubMed ID: 10687700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
    Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Rhythmic discharge properties of caudal cochlear nucleus neurons during postnatal development in cats.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):233-47. PubMed ID: 2905360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
    Rhode WS; Greenberg S
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 71(5):1797-825. PubMed ID: 8064349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Acoustically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recorded From Cochlear Implant Users With Preserved Acoustic Hearing.
    Kim JS; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1061-1077. PubMed ID: 36882917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.
    He S; McFayden TC; Shahsavarani BS; Teagle HFB; Ewend M; Henderson L; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):482-494. PubMed ID: 28968281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Temporal resolution of neurons in cat inferior colliculus to intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of neonatal deafening and chronic stimulation.
    Snyder R; Leake P; Rebscher S; Beitel R
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):449-67. PubMed ID: 7760111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Intensity coding in low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers of the guinea pig.
    Winter IM; Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1958-67. PubMed ID: 1960289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Frequency selectivity in the auditory periphery: similarities between damaged and developing ears.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2321707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Coding of spectral fine structure in the auditory nerve. I. Fourier analysis of period and interspike interval histograms.
    Horst JW; Javel E; Farley GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):398-416. PubMed ID: 3950193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Response dynamics of goldfish saccular fibers: effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on fibers with different tuning, sensitivity, and spontaneous activity.
    Coombs S; Fay RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1025-35. PubMed ID: 3571718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
    Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.