These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14587616)

  • 1. Application of loudness models to sound processing for cochlear implants.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Richardson LM; Henshall KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2190-7. PubMed ID: 14587616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The growth of loudness functions measured in cochlear implant listeners using absolute magnitude estimation and compared using Akaike's information criterion.
    Sanpetrino NM; Smith RL
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1642-4. PubMed ID: 17946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users.
    Wojtczak M; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):396-407. PubMed ID: 12880051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of real-time loudness models can improve speech recognition for cochlear implant users.
    Varsavsky A; McDermott HJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jan; 21(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 22961312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1687-95. PubMed ID: 9069636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.
    Stupak N; Padilla M; Morse RP; Landsberger DM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807535. PubMed ID: 30378468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: effects on loudness growth.
    Hong RS; Rubinstein JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16371847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral Loudness Balancing and Distorted Spatial Perception in Recipients of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Fitzgerald MB; Kan A; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 25985017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness ratio production by cochlear implantees using the spectral maxima sound processor.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 8738632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing.
    Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3706-21. PubMed ID: 9193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):114-24. PubMed ID: 23000118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.