These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14588157)

  • 1. A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Hong JJ; Cohn SM; Ekeh AP; Newman M; Salama M; Leblang SD;
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2003; 4(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 14588157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a computed tomography scan to rule out appendicitis in women of childbearing age is as accurate as clinical examination: a prospective randomized trial.
    Lopez PP; Cohn SM; Popkin CA; Jackowski J; Michalek JE;
    Am Surg; 2007 Dec; 73(12):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18186378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes in obese and normal-weight children undergoing ultrasound for suspected appendicitis.
    Sulowski C; Doria AS; Langer JC; Man C; Stephens D; Schuh S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 18(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 21314776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay.
    Foley TA; Earnest F; Nathan MA; Hough DM; Schiller HJ; Hoskin TL
    Radiology; 2005 Apr; 235(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15749978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy: shortened length of stay without increase in hospital charges.
    Fonseca AL; Schuster KM; Kaplan LJ; Maung AA; Lui FY; Davis KA
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Jul; 149(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 24871698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute appendicitis in children: comparison of clinical diagnosis with ultrasound and CT imaging.
    Karakas SP; Guelfguat M; Leonidas JC; Springer S; Singh SP
    Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Feb; 30(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10663520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving diagnosis of acute appendicitis: results of a diagnostic pathway with standard use of ultrasonography followed by selective use of CT.
    Poortman P; Oostvogel HJ; Bosma E; Lohle PN; Cuesta MA; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Hamming JF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Mar; 208(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 19318006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Kaiser S; Frenckner B; Jorulf HK
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):633-8. PubMed ID: 12034928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of advanced radiographic imaging on the treatment of pediatric appendicitis.
    York D; Smith A; Phillips JD; von Allmen D
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Dec; 40(12):1908-11. PubMed ID: 16338316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates.
    Bendeck SE; Nino-Murcia M; Berry GJ; Jeffrey RB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12354996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of focused helical computed tomographic scanning with rectal contrast only vs triple contrast in the diagnosis of clinically uncertain acute appendicitis: a prospective randomized study.
    Mittal VK; Goliath J; Sabir M; Patel R; Richards BF; Alkalay I; ReMine S; Edwards M
    Arch Surg; 2004 May; 139(5):495-9; discussion 499-500. PubMed ID: 15136349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changing roles of computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis in emergency rooms.
    Ho TL; Muo CH; Shen WC; Kao CH
    QJM; 2015 Aug; 108(8):625-31. PubMed ID: 25614619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Length of stay by route of contrast administration for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed-tomography scan.
    Berg ER; Mehta SD; Mitchell P; Soto J; Oyama L; Ulrich A
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1040-5. PubMed ID: 16973641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.
    McDonald GP; Pendarvis DP; Wilmoth R; Daley BJ
    Am Surg; 2001 Nov; 67(11):1017-21. PubMed ID: 11730216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation.
    Antevil JL; Rivera L; Langenberg BJ; Hahm G; Favata MA; Brown CV
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 17116553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line.
    Pritchett CV; Levinsky NC; Ha YP; Dembe AE; Steinberg SM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 May; 210(5):699-705, 705-7. PubMed ID: 20421033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation.
    Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Spigland N; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2001; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Usefulness of imaging examinations in preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis].
    Nitoń T; Górecka-Nitoń A
    Wiad Lek; 2014; 67(4):548-53. PubMed ID: 26030962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
    Johansson EP; Rydh A; Riklund KA
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Apr; 48(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 17453494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?
    Pickuth D; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Spielmann RP
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10817330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.