These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14588290)
1. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with titanium mesh cages, coralline hydroxyapatite, and demineralized bone matrix as part of a circumferential fusion. Thalgott JS; Giuffre JM; Klezl Z; Timlin M Spine J; 2002; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 14588290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Thalgott JS; Giuffre JM; Fritts K; Timlin M; Klezl Z Spine J; 2001; 1(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 14588393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with processed sea coral (coralline hydroxyapatite) as part of a circumferential fusion. Thalgott JS; Klezl Z; Timlin M; Giuffre JM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(24):E518-25; discussion E526-7. PubMed ID: 12486360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite. Mobbs RJ; Maharaj M; Rao PJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 25325176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does coralline hydroxyapatite conduct fusion in instrumented posterior spine fusion? Korovessis P; Repanti M; Koureas G Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():109-13. PubMed ID: 15457705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo evaluation of coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation in lumbar spinal fusion. Bozic KJ; Glazer PA; Zurakowski D; Simon BJ; Lipson SJ; Hayes WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 10543011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Thalgott JS; Fritts K; Giuffre JM; Timlin M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jul; 24(13):1295-9. PubMed ID: 10404570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications. Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Christensen FB; Hansen ES; Eiskjaer SP; Høy K; Helmig P; Neumann P; Niedermann B; Bünger CE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2674-83. PubMed ID: 12461393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of Autologous Growth Factors (AGF) in lumbar interbody fusion. Jenis LG; Banco RJ; Kwon B Spine J; 2006; 6(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 16413442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harvesting local cylinder autograft from adjacent vertebral body for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique, operative feasibility and preliminary clinical results. Arlet V; Jiang L; Steffen T; Ouellet J; Reindl R; Aebi M Eur Spine J; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1352-9. PubMed ID: 16598484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fusion rate and clinical results between CaO-SiO Lee JH; Kong CB; Yang JJ; Shim HJ; Koo KH; Kim J; Lee CK; Chang BS Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 27498334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Christensen FB Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2004 Oct; 75(313):2-43. PubMed ID: 15559781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement]. Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion. Madan SS; Boeree NR Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 14673717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Korovessis P; Koureas G; Zacharatos S; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E Eur Spine J; 2005 Sep; 14(7):630-8. PubMed ID: 15789231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. Boden SD; Martin GJ; Morone M; Ugbo JL; Titus L; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 10065514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. McConnell JR; Freeman BJ; Debnath UK; Grevitt MP; Prince HG; Webb JK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 12590203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]