349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14588290)
1. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with titanium mesh cages, coralline hydroxyapatite, and demineralized bone matrix as part of a circumferential fusion.
Thalgott JS; Giuffre JM; Klezl Z; Timlin M
Spine J; 2002; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 14588290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone.
Thalgott JS; Giuffre JM; Fritts K; Timlin M; Klezl Z
Spine J; 2001; 1(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 14588393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with processed sea coral (coralline hydroxyapatite) as part of a circumferential fusion.
Thalgott JS; Klezl Z; Timlin M; Giuffre JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(24):E518-25; discussion E526-7. PubMed ID: 12486360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes and fusion rates following anterior lumbar interbody fusion with bone graft substitute i-FACTOR, an anorganic bone matrix/P-15 composite.
Mobbs RJ; Maharaj M; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):867-76. PubMed ID: 25325176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does coralline hydroxyapatite conduct fusion in instrumented posterior spine fusion?
Korovessis P; Repanti M; Koureas G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():109-13. PubMed ID: 15457705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo evaluation of coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation in lumbar spinal fusion.
Bozic KJ; Glazer PA; Zurakowski D; Simon BJ; Lipson SJ; Hayes WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 10543011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.
Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite.
Thalgott JS; Fritts K; Giuffre JM; Timlin M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jul; 24(13):1295-9. PubMed ID: 10404570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.
Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients.
Christensen FB; Hansen ES; Eiskjaer SP; Høy K; Helmig P; Neumann P; Niedermann B; Bünger CE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Dec; 27(23):2674-83. PubMed ID: 12461393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of Autologous Growth Factors (AGF) in lumbar interbody fusion.
Jenis LG; Banco RJ; Kwon B
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 16413442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Harvesting local cylinder autograft from adjacent vertebral body for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique, operative feasibility and preliminary clinical results.
Arlet V; Jiang L; Steffen T; Ouellet J; Reindl R; Aebi M
Eur Spine J; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1352-9. PubMed ID: 16598484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fusion rate and clinical results between CaO-SiO
Lee JH; Kong CB; Yang JJ; Shim HJ; Koo KH; Kim J; Lee CK; Chang BS
Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 27498334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation.
Christensen FB
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2004 Oct; 75(313):2-43. PubMed ID: 15559781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.
Madan SS; Boeree NR
Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 14673717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite.
Korovessis P; Koureas G; Zacharatos S; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Eur Spine J; 2005 Sep; 14(7):630-8. PubMed ID: 15789231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion.
Boden SD; Martin GJ; Morone M; Ugbo JL; Titus L; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 10065514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion.
McConnell JR; Freeman BJ; Debnath UK; Grevitt MP; Prince HG; Webb JK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 12590203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
