206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1458883)
1. Physician negotiations with managed care plans: a primer of antitrust pitfalls.
Ronai SE; Hudner HK
Conn Med; 1992 Oct; 56(10):571-6. PubMed ID: 1458883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Managed competition, integrated delivery systems and antitrust.
Greaney TL
Cornell Law Rev; 1994 Sep; 79(6):1507-45. PubMed ID: 10141442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hope for antitrust relief.
Besaw L
Tex Med; 1996 Jun; 92(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 8685841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DSSNY, managed care and antitrust laws. A marriage of necessity.
Plunkett LR
N Y State Dent J; 1996 May; 62(5):8-11. PubMed ID: 8692465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The stifling of competition by the antitrust laws: the irony of the health care industry.
Powers JA
J Law Health; 2000-2001; 15(2):223-46. PubMed ID: 12238323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician negotiations with managed care plans: an antitrust primer.
Ronai SE; Hudner HK
Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(3):57-66. PubMed ID: 10126801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician relationships with health maintenance organizations cause antitrust problems.
Rosen BF; Warbasse BW
Healthspan; 1993 May; 10(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 10127752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating antitrust risk in joint provider negotiations with payors.
Leonard EJ
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10115450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoid the antitrust trap: providers must study the law before they partner.
Litwak P
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1999 Aug; 8(4):19-23. PubMed ID: 10557691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Limits placed on PHOs by antitrust rulings, transitional structure for integration.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1995 Nov; 13(11):14-5. PubMed ID: 10151858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal obstacles to medical communities' full participation in managed care.
Hilgers DW
J Health Care Finance; 1995; 21(3):9-16. PubMed ID: 7600242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strength in numbers or antitrust trouble?
Bianculli JL
Contemp Longterm Care; 1997 May; 20(5):60-1. PubMed ID: 10167546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical care. Antitrust laws emerging exemption.
Troupis JR
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1997 Jul; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10173326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Networks can avoid antitrust scrutiny.
Waxman JM
Provider; 1997 Feb; 23(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 10167120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The fraud and abuse statute in an evolving health care marketplace: life in the health care speakeasy.
Blumstein JF
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(2-3):205-31. PubMed ID: 8862242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antitrust exemption: are health providers crying wolf?
Barnett AA
J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 10125734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competition.
Busard TR
J Fla Med Assoc; 1996 Mar; 83(3):209. PubMed ID: 8920054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unbridled managed care: when consumers experience antitrust welfare loss from exclusionary contracts between HMO insurers and health care providers.
Ruskin A
Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):391-469. PubMed ID: 10178393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical restraints and powerful health insurers: exclusionary conduct masquerading as managed care?
Miller FH
Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):195-236. PubMed ID: 10295963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The legal framework for effective competition.
Berenson RA; Hastings DA; Kopit WG
Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():235-65. PubMed ID: 11066262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
