These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14588950)

  • 1. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome.
    Beutler WJ; Peppelman WC
    Spine J; 2003; 3(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 14589189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic comparison of L5-S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage subsidence and displacement by fixation strategy: anterior plate versus integrated screws.
    Theologis AA; Patel S; Burch S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):126-130. PubMed ID: 36057128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
    Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior cervical fusion: a comparison of cage, dowel and dowel-plate constructs.
    Cauthen JC; Theis RP; Allen AT
    Spine J; 2003; 3(2):106-17; discussion 117. PubMed ID: 14589223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Short-term effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 intervertebral cage for lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lower lumbar degenerative diseases].
    Yang X; Song Y; Kong Q; Gong Q; Pei F; Tu C
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1425-9. PubMed ID: 23316629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
    Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Ukogu C; Harvey JP; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Khanna K; Sheha ED; Gandhi SD; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 37148223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
    Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone Trabecular Metal cages for repeatedly recurrent lumbar disc herniation and back pain.
    Lequin MB; Verbaan D; Bouma GJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 24678638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries.
    Ni J; Zheng Y; Liu N; Wang X; Fang X; Phukan R; Wood KB
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24(4):791-9. PubMed ID: 25618451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [One-segment interbody lumbar arthrodesis using impacted cages: posterior unilateral approach versus posterior bilateral approach].
    Commarmond J
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11319424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in U.S. servicemen.
    Molinari RW; Sloboda JF; Arrington EC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S24-9. PubMed ID: 15699802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Holsapple G; Adams K; Blumenthal S; Guyer RD; Dmietriev A; Maxwell JH; Regan JJ; Isaza J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1576-83; discussion E388-90. PubMed ID: 16025025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.