These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14589568)
1. Construct validity of the San Diego Neuropsychological Test Battery. Baser CA; Ruff RM Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 1987; 2(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 14589568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of a standardized battery of Luria's tests in the diagnosis of lateralized cerebral dysfunction. Osmon DC; Golden CJ; Purisch AD; Hammeke TA; Blume HG Int J Neurosci; 1979; 9(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 437940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)]. Bralet MC; Navarre M; Eskenazi AM; Lucas-Ross M; Falissard B Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):557-62. PubMed ID: 19081451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: lessons from memory assessment. Delis DC; Jacobson M; Bondi MW; Hamilton JM; Salmon DP J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2003 Sep; 9(6):936-46. PubMed ID: 14632252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comments on a standardized version of Luria's tests. Akhutina TV; Tsvetkova LS Brain Cogn; 1983 Apr; 2(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 6546017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Luria's approach to neuropsychological assessment. Ardila A Int J Neurosci; 1992 Sep; 66(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 1304568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construct validity of the Neuropsychological Screening Battery for Hispanics (NeSBHIS) in a neurological sample. Bender HA; Cole JR; Aponte-Samalot M; Cruz-Laureano D; Myers L; Vazquez BR; Barr WB J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Mar; 15(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19215638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of Luria's method for the neurobehavioral assessment of encephalopathy in an adolescent: application in a rehabilitation setting. Guedalia J; Finkelstein Y; Drukker A; Frishberg Y Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 14590561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Nuechterlein KH; Green MF; Kern RS; Baade LE; Barch DM; Cohen JD; Essock S; Fenton WS; Frese FJ; Gold JM; Goldberg T; Heaton RK; Keefe RS; Kraemer H; Mesholam-Gately R; Seidman LJ; Stover E; Weinberger DR; Young AS; Zalcman S; Marder SR Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Feb; 165(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 18172019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trait analyses of the Luria-Nebraska Intellectual Processes, Motor Functions, and Memory Scales. Macciocchi SN; Fowler PC; Ranseen JD Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 1992 Nov; 7(6):541-51. PubMed ID: 14591405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Construct validity of neuropsychological instrumentation with a learning disabled population. Gamble CM; Mishra SP; Obrzut JE Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 1988; 3(4):359-68. PubMed ID: 14591426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical and subcortical constructs of the dean-woodcock sensory motor battery: a construct validity study. Davis AS; Finch HW; Dean RS; Woodcock RW Int J Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1157-71. PubMed ID: 16923684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Construct validity of the five-factor Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. Van Roy B; Veenstra M; Clench-Aas J J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1304-12. PubMed ID: 19120709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factor analysis and matrix invariance of the HRNB-C category test. Kelly MD; Kundert DK; Dean RS Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 1992 Oct; 7(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 14591276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A battery approach for measuring neuropsychological change. Woods SP; Childers M; Ellis RJ; Guaman S; Grant I; Heaton RK; Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Jan; 21(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 16169705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Single versus composite score discriminative validity with the Halstead-Reitan Battery and the Stroop Test in mild brain injury. Rojas DC; Bennett TL Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 1995 Mar; 10(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 14589732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties and factor structure of an expanded CERAD neuropsychological battery in an elderly VA sample. Jones SN; Ayers CR Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 May; 21(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 16766158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Gualtieri CT; Johnson LG Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 21(7):623-43. PubMed ID: 17014981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factor analysis of the Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery. II: Visual, receptive, expressive and reading scales. Golden CJ; Purisch A; Sweet J; Graber B; Osmon D; Hammeke T Int J Neurosci; 1980; 11(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 7440091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization]. Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]