These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14593342)

  • 1. U.S. Supreme Court to review drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(5):26-9. PubMed ID: 14593342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ADA: Supreme Court disallows disparate impact analysis of facially valid employment procedures.
    Walter S
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):373-5. PubMed ID: 15301205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme court reviews drug addiction case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2004; 15(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 15026764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A court case that could galvanize a field. Raytheon v. Hernandez.
    de Miranda J
    Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 2003 Dec; 12(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 14696290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Employer may discipline on basis of current substance abuse. Shafer v. Preston Memorial Hospital.
    West JC
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1997; 17(3):41-2. PubMed ID: 10184731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court clarifies employee/employer status.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(4):30-4. PubMed ID: 12869946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ADA complicates disciplining of employees with substance abuse problems.
    Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1995 Oct; 16(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10184433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 2003 employment decisions under the ADA Title I--survey update.
    Allbright AL
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2004; 28(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 15384870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supreme court agrees to define employer.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 12532074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ADA: Supreme Court denies cert to ADA duty of accommodation case.
    Geertsma M
    J Law Med Ethics; 2002; 30(3):455-8. PubMed ID: 12497707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court confronts HIV: reflections on Bragdon v. Abbott.
    Parmet WE
    J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):225-40, 179. PubMed ID: 11066881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
    Coelho T
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Regarded as" disabled.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 16061156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proving disability remains difficult.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2004; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 14961012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Supreme Court decides important accessibility case.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2004; 15(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 15247892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. Supreme Court refuses appeal on union seniority issue.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Apr; 12(7):3. PubMed ID: 11364233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disability. Supreme Court decision further erodes ADA protections.
    AIDS Policy Law; 2003 May; 18(9):7. PubMed ID: 12772653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More on reasonable accommodation.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2005; 16(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 15999083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physician practice groups--the effect of Clackamas.
    Siegel S
    Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Sep; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 14526527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congress restores the Americans With Disabilities Act to its original intent.
    Petrila J
    Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jul; 60(7):878-9. PubMed ID: 19564215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.