These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14593793)

  • 21. Prejudice and terror management at trial: Effects of defendant race/ethnicity and mortality salience on mock-jurors' verdict judgments.
    Leippe MR; Bergold AN; Eisenstadt D
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(3):279-294. PubMed ID: 27136391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions.
    Hymes RW; Leinart M; Rowe S; Rogers W
    J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):627-34. PubMed ID: 8283859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments.
    Brewer N; Burke A
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Jun; 26(3):353-64. PubMed ID: 12061623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
    Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.
    Wuensch KL; Campbell MW; Kesler FC; Moore CH
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 142(5):587-600. PubMed ID: 12236469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The testimony of elderly victim/witnesses and their impact on juror decisions: the importance of examining multiple stereotypes.
    Nunez N; McCoy ML; Clark HL; Shaw LA
    Law Hum Behav; 1999 Aug; 23(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 10439725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
    Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Jurors' cognitive depletion and performance during jury deliberation as a function of jury diversity and defendant race.
    Peter-Hagene L
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):232-249. PubMed ID: 31120276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proven and not proven: A potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Turner J; Frumkin LA; Jackson E; Lages M
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 May; 40(3):452-466. PubMed ID: 35460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
    Maeder EM; McManus LA
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
    Jung S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intergroup time bias and racialized social relations.
    Vala J; Pereira CR; Oliveira Lima ME; Leyens JP
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Apr; 38(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 22143309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.