These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14593796)

  • 1. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Apr; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27180511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis.
    Behrman BW; Davey SL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 11688368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian analysis on the (dis)utility of iterative-showup procedures: The moderating impact of prior probabilities.
    Smith AM; Lindsay RC; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 27182619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias.
    Freire A; Lee K; Williamson KS; Stuart SJ; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15264450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.
    Lindsay RC; Lea JA; Nosworthy GJ; Fulford JA; Hector J; LeVan V; Seabrook C
    J Appl Psychol; 1991 Dec; 76(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 1774217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure.
    Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.
    Hinz T; Pezdek K
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 11419382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: experimental control and real-world simulation.
    Clark SE; Tunnicliff JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 11480800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.
    Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy?
    Bergold AN; Heaton P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.