BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14594541)

  • 1. A prospective audit of the implementation of the 2-week rule for assessment of suspected urological cancers.
    Coxon JP; Harris HJ; Watkin NA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Sep; 85(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 14594541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 2-week rule for suspected head and neck cancer in the United Kingdom: referral patterns, diagnostic efficacy of the guidelines and compliance.
    McKie C; Ahmad UA; Fellows S; Meikle D; Stafford FW; Thomson PJ; Welch AR; Paleri V
    Oral Oncol; 2008 Sep; 44(9):851-6. PubMed ID: 18234546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-week rule: has prioritisation of breast referrals by general practitioners improved?
    Imkampe A; Bendall S; Chianakwalam C
    Breast; 2006 Oct; 15(5):654-8. PubMed ID: 16580206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.
    Debnath D; Dielehner N; Gunning KA
    Postgrad Med J; 2002 Dec; 78(926):748-51. PubMed ID: 12509694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do patients with frank haematuria referred under the two-week rule have a higher incidence of bladder cancer?
    Thiruchelvam N; Mostafid H
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Sep; 87(5):345-7. PubMed ID: 16176693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urgent suspected cancer referrals from general practice: audit of compliance with guidelines and referral outcomes.
    Baughan P; Keatings J; O'Neill B
    Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Nov; 61(592):e700-6. PubMed ID: 22054333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
    Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of urology two-week wait referrals in a large teaching hospital in England.
    Mathew A; Desai KM
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 May; 91(4):310-2. PubMed ID: 19344552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of two-week rule referrals for suspected testicular cancer in Cornwall, 2003-2005.
    Kumaraswamy P; Cox R; O'Rourke JS; Willis RG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009 Apr; 91(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 19220945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audit of acute referrals to the Department of Dermatology at Waikato Hospital: comparison with national access criteria for first specialist appointment.
    Stanway A; Oakley A; Rademaker M; Duffill M
    N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1192):U849. PubMed ID: 15107871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?
    Khawaja AR; Allan SM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Sep; 26(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 11034802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The '2-week wait' rule for referrals for suspected urological cancers--urgent need for refinement of criteria.
    Hawary AM; Warburton HE; Brough RJ; Collins GN; Brown SC; O'Reilly PH; Adeyoju AA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2008 Sep; 90(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 18765032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective audit of gastroscopy under the 'three-day rule': a regional initiative in Italy to reduce waiting time for suspected malignancy.
    Parente F; Bargiggia S; Bianchi Porro G
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2002 May; 16(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 11966511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The two-week wait cancer initiative on oral cancer; the predictive value of urgent referrals to an oral medicine unit.
    Singh P; Warnakulasuriya S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Dec; 201(11):717-20; discussion 714. PubMed ID: 17159958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the two-week rule pathway improve the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma? A retrospective review of referral patterns and outcomes over five years in a regional sarcoma centre.
    Pencavel TD; Strauss DC; Thomas GP; Thomas JM; Hayes AJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jul; 92(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 20487596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Referral patterns, cancer diagnoses, and waiting times after introduction of two week wait rule for breast cancer: prospective cohort study.
    Potter S; Govindarajulu S; Shere M; Braddon F; Curran G; Greenwood R; Sahu AK; Cawthorn SJ
    BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7614):288. PubMed ID: 17631514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two audits of the diagnosis of oral cancer and the two-week rule following referrals from primary care practitioners in Newcastle.
    Miller CC; Hierons RJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2012 Apr; 19(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22507147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
    Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
    Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the two week rule of any benefit to patients with oral cancer?
    East SC; Stocker JL; Avery BS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 43(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 15908082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.