245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14595042)
1. A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants.
Stefanescu BM; Murphy WP; Hansell BJ; Fuloria M; Morgan TM; Aschner JL
Pediatrics; 2003 Nov; 112(5):1031-8. PubMed ID: 14595042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs.
Davis P; Davies M; Faber B
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2001 Sep; 85(2):F82-5. PubMed ID: 11517198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during weaning from intermittent mandatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants have risks or benefits? A controlled trial.
Tapia JL; Bancalari A; González A; Mercado ME
Pediatr Pulmonol; 1995 May; 19(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 7567201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus Infant Flow for Preterm infants.
Campbell DM; Shah PS; Shah V; Kelly EN
J Perinatol; 2006 Sep; 26(9):546-9. PubMed ID: 16837929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants.
Barrington KJ; Bull D; Finer NN
Pediatrics; 2001 Apr; 107(4):638-41. PubMed ID: 11335736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery room continuous positive airway pressure/positive end-expiratory pressure in extremely low birth weight infants: a feasibility trial.
Finer NN; Carlo WA; Duara S; Fanaroff AA; Donovan EF; Wright LL; Kandefer S; Poole WK;
Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15342835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized, controlled trial of nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in the extubation of very low birth weight infants.
Annibale DJ; Hulsey TC; Engstrom PC; Wallin LA; Ohning BL
J Pediatr; 1994 Mar; 124(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 8120721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD003212. PubMed ID: 25188554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partial pressure of carbon dioxide in extremely low birth weight infants supported by nasal prongs continuous positive airway pressure.
Nguyen AT; Aly H; Milner J; Patel KM; El-Mohandes A
Pediatrics; 2003 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):e208-11. PubMed ID: 12949314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus Infant Flow Driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
Gupta S; Sinha SK; Tin W; Donn SM
J Pediatr; 2009 May; 154(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 19230906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early extubation attempts reduce length of stay in extremely preterm infants even if re-intubation is necessary.
Robbins M; Trittmann J; Martin E; Reber KM; Nelin L; Shepherd E
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2015; 8(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 26410431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of non-synchronized Nasopharyngeal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (nsNIMV) vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the prevention of extubation failure in pre-term < 1,500 grams.
Khorana M; Paradeevisut H; Sangtawesin V; Kanjanapatanakul W; Chotigeat U; Ayutthaya JK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Oct; 91 Suppl 3():S136-42. PubMed ID: 19253509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extubation failure in infants with shunt-dependent pulmonary blood flow and univentricular physiology.
Gupta P; McDonald R; Goyal S; Gossett JM; Imamura M; Agarwal A; Butt W; Bhutta AT
Cardiol Young; 2014 Feb; 24(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 23328580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bubble vs conventional continuous positive airway pressure for prevention of extubation failure in preterm very low birth weight infants: a pilot study.
Yadav S; Thukral A; Sankar MJ; Sreenivas V; Deorari AK; Paul VK; Agarwal R
Indian J Pediatr; 2012 Sep; 79(9):1163-8. PubMed ID: 22189698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation.
Khalaf MN; Brodsky N; Hurley J; Bhandari V
Pediatrics; 2001 Jul; 108(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11433048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compliance of the respiratory system as a predictor for successful extubation in very-low-birth-weight infants recovering from respiratory distress syndrome.
Smith J; Pieper CH; Maree D; Gie RP
S Afr Med J; 1999 Oct; 89(10):1097-102. PubMed ID: 10582068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of Extubation Readiness Using Spontaneous Breathing Trials in Extremely Preterm Neonates.
Shalish W; Kanbar L; Kovacs L; Chawla S; Keszler M; Rao S; Latremouille S; Precup D; Brown K; Kearney RE; Sant'Anna GM
JAMA Pediatr; 2020 Feb; 174(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 31860014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Optimal Predictors of Readiness for Extubation in Low Birth Weight Infants.
Janjindamai W; Pasee S; Thatrimontrichai A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Apr; 100(4):427-34. PubMed ID: 29911842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extubation from low-rate intermittent positive airways pressure versus extubation after a trial of endotracheal continuous positive airways pressure in intubated preterm infants.
Davis PG; Henderson-Smart DJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD001078. PubMed ID: 11687097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation.
Kahramaner Z; Erdemir A; Turkoglu E; Cosar H; Sutcuoglu S; Ozer EA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Jun; 27(9):926-9. PubMed ID: 24047121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]