These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1459570)

  • 21. Visual effects of the luminance surrounding a computer display.
    Sheedy JE; Smith R; Hayes J
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jul; 48(9):1114-28. PubMed ID: 16251151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting the psychophysical image quality evaluation of mobile phone displays: the case of transmissive liquid-crystal displays.
    Kim YJ; Luo MR; Choe W; Kim HS; Park SO; Baek Y; Rhodes P; Lee S; Kim CY
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Sep; 25(9):2215-22. PubMed ID: 18758547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal variation in the luminance level of stimuli displayed on a cathode-ray tube monitor: effects on performance on a visual vigilance task.
    Blanco MJ; Leirós LI
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 10675061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographs.
    Flynn MJ; Kanicki J; Badano A; Eyler WR
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(6):1653-69. PubMed ID: 10555680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe shape characteristics.
    Tsang SN; Chan AH; Yu RF
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1028-42. PubMed ID: 22676836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance evaluation of soft copy display systems according to AAPM TG18 protocol.
    Olgar T; Kamberli E
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Jun; 36(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 23729181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do liquid crystal displays assure better readability than cathode-ray tubes?
    Ishihara S; Miyao M; Kashiwamata M; Furuta M; Kondo T; Sakakibara H; Yamada S
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1993 Aug; 48(3):752-6. PubMed ID: 8377259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.
    Hemminger BM; Dillon AW; Johnston RE; Muller KE; Deluca MC; Coffey CS; Pisano ED
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2266-72. PubMed ID: 10587207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of ambient illumination, luminance contrast, and stimulus type on subjective preference of VDT target and background color combinations.
    Shieh KK; Lai YK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):336-52. PubMed ID: 19093596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Active matrix liquid crystal displays for clinical imaging: comparison with cathode ray tube displays.
    Pavlicek W; Owen JM; Peter MB
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):155-61. PubMed ID: 10847388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Depth discrimination from shading under diffuse lighting.
    Langer MS; Bülthoff HH
    Perception; 2000; 29(6):649-60. PubMed ID: 11040949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceived contrast on displays with different luminance ranges.
    Sund P
    Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2270-2278. PubMed ID: 35119116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intra- and interobserver agreement and performance score of breast phantom image interpretation: influence of ambient room lighting levels.
    Koyama K; Shimamoto K; Ikeda M; Muramoto H; Satake H; Sawaki A; Kato K; Fukushima H; Ishigaki T
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun; 68(3-4):147-53. PubMed ID: 16967781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading.
    Dobres J; Chahine N; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():68-73. PubMed ID: 28166901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
    Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ["Glare vision". I. Physiological principles of vision change with increased test field luminance].
    Hauser B; Ochsner H; Zrenner E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 200(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1578860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lightness constancy and illumination discounting.
    Logvinenko AD; Tokunaga R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1886-902. PubMed ID: 21688072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual assessment method of angular performance in medical liquid-crystal displays by use of the ANG test pattern: effect of ambient illuminance and effectiveness of modified scoring.
    Ikushima Y; Morishita J; Akamine H; Nakamura Y; Hashimoto N
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23934325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.