247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14596175)
1. Has the legal atmosphere for "managed care" forever changed? Impact of the limitations on ERISA.
Kinderman K
J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 19(2):100-1. PubMed ID: 14596175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. State regulation of managed care and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 1996 Dec; 335(26):1986-90. PubMed ID: 8960481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The secret life of the dominant form of managed care: self-insured ERISA networks.
Weller CD
Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):305-48. PubMed ID: 10178391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The emerging convergence of the doctrine of informed consent and judicial reinterpretation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Blackmon W
J Leg Med; 1998 Sep; 19(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 9775579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The circuitous journey to the Patients' Bill of Rights: winners and losers.
Reece S
Albany Law Rev; 2000-2001; 65(1):17-95. PubMed ID: 11949702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Profusion of health care laws creates compliance problems for health plans.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):10-2. PubMed ID: 12369342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy; 2000 Apr; (8):1-15. PubMed ID: 12426709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Countdown to patient protection.
Roslokken DW
Bus Health; 1999 Apr; 17(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 10351246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Employee health plan protections under ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Polzer K; Butler PA
Health Aff (Millwood); 1997; 16(5):93-102. PubMed ID: 9314679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Managed care's Crimea: medical necessity, therapeutic benefit, and the goals of administrative process in health insurance.
Sage WM
Duke Law J; 2003 Nov; 53(2):597-651. PubMed ID: 15241875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Battle over regulation ahead.
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1997 Dec; 15(12):16. PubMed ID: 10175494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Effects of PARCA liability measure hard to see behind ERISA's veil.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 May; 52(19):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10179408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State government ... seek greater flexibility to implement managed care solutions.
Wise D
State Health Care Am; 1995; ():61-6. PubMed ID: 10168076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for analysis of ERISA preemption in suits against health plans and a call for reform.
Scheutzow SO
J Law Health; 1996-1997; 11(1-2):195-219. PubMed ID: 10176242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managed care liability and ERISA preemption.
Rakich JS; Ledbetter RK
Manag Care Q; 2000; 8(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 11009731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Network participation by employees of managed care organizations: good business judgement or a prohibited transaction under ERISA? Part I.
Davidson CE
Med Interface; 1995 Feb; 8(2):78-80, 85. PubMed ID: 10140635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Should ERISA be amended?
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Feb; 129(2):242-4. PubMed ID: 9495059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits parity: what's a healthy mind worth?
Ziegler J
Bus Health; 1997 Sep; 15(9):46-7, 50, 53 passim. PubMed ID: 10173233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]