153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14596300)
1. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography.
Kharrati H; Zarrad B
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.
Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Shen SZ; Yaffe MJ; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7179-90. PubMed ID: 26348995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
Wu X; Gingold EL; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography.
Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray spectroscopy applied to radiation shielding calculation in mammography.
Künzel R; Levenhagen RS; Herdade SB; Terini RA; Costa PR
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3539-45. PubMed ID: 18777914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microdosimetric characterisation of 28 kVp Mo/Mo, Rh/Rh, Rh/Al, W/Rh and Mo/Rh mammography X ray spectra.
Verhaegen F; Castellano IA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 99(1-4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12194338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Target-filter combination effects on breast tissue characterization using mammographic X-rays: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Elshemey WM; Saif RA; Elfiky AA
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(4):823-834. PubMed ID: 35599527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of mammographic x-ray spectra generated using Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System.
Chusin T; Matsubara K; Takemura A; Okubo R; Ogawa Y
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(6):065004. PubMed ID: 32187021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines.
Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A
Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
